Spatial task instructions and global activation trends influence functional modularity in the cortical reach network
Luciano MusaiD, Amirhossein GhaderiiD, Y. Chen, J. Douglas CrawfordiD
Abstract
Humans can be instructed to ignore visual cues or use them as landmarks for aiming movements (Musa et al. 2024), but it is not known how such allocentric cues interact with egocentric target codes and general planning activity to influence cortical network properties. To answer these questions, we applied graph theory analysis (GTA) to a previously described fMRI dataset (Chen et al. 2014). Participants were instructed to reach toward targets defined in egocentric or landmark-centered (allocentric) coordinates. During Egocentric pointing, cortical nodes clustered into four bilateral modules with correlated BOLD signals: a superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module, an inferior parietal / lateral frontal module, a superior temporal / inferior frontal module, and an inferior occipital-temporal / prefrontal module. The Allocentric task showed only three modules, in part because inferior occipital nodes were incorporated into the superior occipital-parietal / somatomotor module. Both tasks engaged local (within module) and global (between module) cortical hubs, but the Allocentric task recruited additional hubs associated with allocentric visual codes and ego-allocentric integration. Removing reach-related activation trends reduced global synchrony and increased clustering, specifically diminishing dorsoventral coupling in the allocentric task. Cross-validated decoding confirmed that modularity provided the best predicter of task type and suggest that temporal / parietal modules spanning prefrontal cortex play an important role in task instruction. These results demonstrate that activation trends related to motor plans influence global network integration, whereas task instructions influence intermediate / local network properties, such as the modular integration and hub recruitment observed in our Allocentric task. HighlightsO_LIThe study explores how egocentric and allocentric cues affect cortical networks. C_LIO_LIGraph theory analysis (GTA) was applied to fMRI data from pointing tasks. C_LIO_LIEgocentric pointing formed four cortical modules; allocentric formed three. C_LIO_LIAllocentric tasks recruited additional hubs for dorsal-ventral integration. C_LIO_LIRemoving reach-related activation trends reduced global synchrony in the allocentric task. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modular Integration of Auditory Instructions and Visual Cues into the Cortical Reach Network
Gaelle N. Luabeya, Ada Le, … J. Douglas Crawford·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2026
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Differentiates Egocentric vs. Allocentric Network Hubs for Memory-Guided Reach
Lina Musa, Gaelle N. Luabeya, … J. Douglas Crawford·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2026
- Cortical Mechanisms for Reaches Versus Saccades: Progression of Effector-Specificity Through Target Memory to Movement Planning and Execution
David C. Cappadocia, Simona Monaco, … J. Douglas Crawford·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2018
- Integration of eye-centered and landmark-centered codes in frontal eye field gaze responses
Vishal Bharmauria, Amirsaman Sajad, … J. Douglas Crawford·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2020
- Task-related effective connectivity reveals that the cortical rich club gates cortex-wide communication
Mario Senden, Niels Reuter, … Matthieu Gilson·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2017
- Beyond Reach I: Neuroimaging Reveals Different Cortico-cerebellar Networks for Grasp vs. Object Placement.
Gaelle N. Luabeya, Erez Freud, J. Douglas Crawford·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2026