bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Beyond Reach I: Neuroimaging Reveals Different Cortico-cerebellar Networks for Grasp vs. Object Placement.
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Object manipulation usually involves both acquisition and placement, but neuroimaging studies tend to focus on its initial reach-to-grasp component. To understand how grasp and placement are represented in the brain, we designed an event-related fMRI study in which 20 participants alternated between grasping / placing a rectangular object from / toward templates presented at variable locations and orientations on an inclined plane. Despite the similarity in target information (i.e., location and orientation), we expected to see sensory and intentional task differences, as the grasp relied on matching the hand to the object, whereas placement relied on matching the object to the template. For our analysis, we examined BOLD activation across two epochs (planning phase before movement onset and execution phase during the movement), and applied graph-theoretical analysis (GTA) of whole-brain functional connectivity based on the joint time series from these two epochs. In both tasks, we found that common activation was more focused on prefrontal regions during planning and on sensorimotor regions during execution, with a specific increase in cerebellar activation during placement. Furthermore, the greater placement activation was also found in action-related regions of interest during the planning phase, and they could accurately decode between our two tasks. GTA categorized the two networks into three identical modules (prefrontal, cerebellar-occipito-parietal, and sensorimotor) and found task-based differences in modularity scores in the prefrontal and cerebellar-occipito-parietal modules. Overall, these data show that although reach-to-grasp and reach-to-place movements share extensive neural circuitry, they also exhibit task-specific differences, likely related to differences in intentionality during planning and in sensory feedback during movement execution.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reach plans for grasping vs. placing objects evoke different neural dynamics within a shared cortico-cerebellar mechanism.
Petros Georgiadis, Gaelle N. Luabeya, … J. Douglas Crawford·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- Grasping with a twist: Dissociating action goals from motor actions in human frontoparietal circuits
Guy Rens, Teresa D. Figley, … Jody C. Culham·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2023
- Distinct neural components of visually guided grasping during planning and execution
Lina K. Klein, Guido Maiello, … Roland W. Fleming·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2023
- Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, … Matthias Niemeier·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2025
- Action intentions result in the task-specific integration of object features
Nina Lee, Matthias Niemeier·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025
- Neural Correlates of Motor Imagery, Action Observation, and Movement Execution: A Comparison Across Quantitative Meta-Analyses
Robert M. Hardwick, Svenja Caspers, … Stephan Patrick Swinnen·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2018