Capturing site-to-site variability through Hierarchical Bayesian calibration of a process-based dynamic vegetation model
I. Fer, A. N. Shiklomanov, K. A. Novick, C. M. Gough, M. A. Arain, J. Chen, B. Murphy, A. R. Desai, M. C. Dietze
Abstract
Process-based ecosystem models help us understand and predict ecosystem processes, but using them has long involved a difficult choice between performing data- and labor-intensive site-level calibrations or relying on general parameters that may not reflect local conditions. Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) calibration provides a third option that frees modelers from assuming model parameters to be completely generic or completely site-specific and allows a formal distinction between prediction at known calibration sites and "out-of-sample" prediction to new sites. Here, we compare calibrations of a process-based dynamic vegetation model to eddy-covariance data across 12 temperate deciduous Ameriflux sites fit using either site-specific, joint cross-site, or HB approaches. To be able to apply HB to computationally demanding process-based models we introduce a novel emulator-based HB calibration tool, which we make available through the PEcAn community cyberinfrastructure. Using these calibrations to make predictions at held-out tower sites, we show that the joint cross-site calibration is falsely over-confident because it neglects parameter variability across sites and therefore underestimates variance in parameter distributions. By showing which parameters show high site-to-site variability, HB calibration also formally gives us a structure that can detect which process representations are missing from the models and prioritize errors based on the magnitude of the associated uncertainty. For example, in our case-study, we were able to identify large site-to-site variability in the parameters related to the temperature responses of respiration and photosynthesis, associated with a lack of thermal acclimation and adaptation in the model. Moving forward, HB approaches present important new opportunities for statistical modeling of the spatiotemporal variability in modeled parameters and processes that yields both new insights and improved predictions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A calibration framework to improve mechanistic forecasts with hybrid dynamic models
V. Boussange, P. Vilimelis Aceituno, … L. Pellissier·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2022
- Spatio-temporal structural equation modeling in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. II. What controls acid grassland vegetation?
C. Damgaard·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2020
- The chaos in calibrating crop models
D. Wallach, T. Palosuo, … Srivas·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2020
- rsofun v5.0: A model-data integration framework for simulating ecosystem processes
J. Aran Paredes, K. Hufkens, … B. D. Stocker·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2023
- The influence of canopy radiation parameter uncertainty on model projections of terrestrial carbon and energy cycling
T. Viskari, A. Shiklomanov, … S. Serbin·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2019
- Bayesian hierarchical models can infer interpretable predictions of leaf area index from heterogeneous datasets
O. Stojanovic, B. Siegmann, … J. Leugering·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2021