Visual epidural field potentials possess high functional specificity in single trials.
Benjamin Fischer, Andreas SchanderiD, Andreas Kurt Kreiter, Walter LangiD, Detlef WegeneriD
Abstract
Recordings of epidural field potentials (EFPs) allow to acquire neuronal activity over a large region of cortical tissue with minimal invasiveness. Because electrodes are placed on top of the dura and do not enter the neuronal tissue, EFPs offer intriguing options for both clinical and basic science research. On the other hand, EFPs represent the integrated activity of larger neuronal populations, possess a higher trial-by-trial variability, and a reduced signal-to-noise ratio due the additional barrier of the dura. It is thus unclear whether and to what extent EFPs have sufficient spatial selectivity to allow for conclusions about the underlying functional cortical architecture, and whether single EFP trials provide enough information on the short time scales relevant for many clinical and basic neuroscience purposes. We here use the high spatial resolution of primary visual cortex to address these issues and investigate the extent to which very short EFP traces allow reliable decoding of spatial information. We briefly presented different visual objects at one out of nine closely adjacent locations and recorded neuronal activity with a high-density, epidural multi-electrode array in three macaque monkeys. Using receiver-operating characteristics to identify most-informative data, machine-learning algorithms provided close-to-perfect classification rates for all 27 stimulus conditions. A binary classifier applying a simple max function on ROC-selected data further showed that single trials might be classified with 100% performance even without advanced offline classifiers. Thus, although highly variable, EFPs constitute an extremely valuable source of information and offer new perspectives for minimally invasive recording of large-scale networks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Field percentile
- top 44%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Monkey V1 epidural field potentials provide significant information about stimulus location, size, shape, and color.
Benjamin Fischer, Detlef Wegener·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2021
- Deep learning based decoding of local field potential events
Achim Schilling, Richard Carl Gerum, … Patrick Krauß·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2022
- Sensing Local Field Potentials with a Directional and Scalable Depth Electrode Array
A. M. Abrego, W. Khan, … J. Seymour·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2021
- Near-field potentials index local neural computations more accurately than population spiking
David A. Tovar, Jacob Alan Westerberg, … Alexander Maier·bioRxiv·May 11, 2023
- Very high density EEG elucidates spatiotemporal aspects of early visual processing
Amanda K. Robinson, Praveen Venkatesh, … Marlene Behrmann·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2017
- Estimating Visual Receptive Fields from EEG
Changxing Huang, Nanlin Shi, … Xiaorong Gao·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026