henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Faces under continuous flash suppression capture attention faster than objects, but without a face evoked steady-state visual potential: Is curvilinearity responsible for the behavioral effect?

Andrew D. EngelliD, Henry M. Quillian

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Face perception is a vital part of human social interactions. The social value of faces makes their efficient detection evolutionarily advantageous. It has been suggested that this might occur nonconsciously, but experimental results are equivocal thus far. Here, we probe nonconscious face perception using a novel combination of binocular rivalry with continuous flash suppression, and steady-state visually evoked potentials. In the first two experiments, participants viewed either non-face objects, neutral faces (Study 1), or fearful faces (Study 2). Consistent with the hypothesis that faces are processed nonconsciously, we found that faces broke through suppression faster than objects. We did not, however, observe a concomitant face-selective SSVEP. Study 3 was run to reconcile this paradox. We hypothesized that the faster breakthrough time was due to a mid-level visual feature, curvilinearity, rather than high-level category membership, which would explain the behavioral difference without neural evidence of face-selective processing. We tested this hypothesis by presenting participants with four different groups of stimuli outside of conscious awareness: rectilinear objects (e.g., chessboard), curvilinear objects (e.g., dartboard), faces, and objects that were not dominantly curvilinear or rectilinear. We found that faces and curvilinear objects broke through suppression faster than objects and rectilinear objects. Moreover, there was no difference between faces and curvilinear objects. These results support our hypothesis that the observed behavioral advantage for faces is due to their curvilinearity, rather than category membership.\n\nHighlightsO_LIFaces presented outside of awareness do not evoke a steady-state visually evoked potential.\nC_LIO_LIThis is true for both neutral and fearful faces.\nC_LIO_LIHowever, faces do breakthrough interocular suppression faster than objects.\nC_LIO_LICurvilinear objects breakthrough interocular suppression faster than rectilinear objects.\nC_LIO_LIThe breakthrough time advantage for faces over objects is due to their curvilinearity.\nC_LI

Citations
6
FWCI
0.67
Field percentile
top 36%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCiorli '25Quek '24Rajananda '20Baroni '17Rekow '21Yang '20
74% semantic matchNeuroscience
Tommaso Ciorli, Lorenzo Pia, Timo Stein·Consciousness and Cognition·Feb 18, 2025· 6 citations