Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Faces under continuous flash suppression capture attention faster than objects, but without a face evoked steady-state visual potential: Is curvilinearity responsible for the behavioral effect?
Abstract
Face perception is a vital part of human social interactions. The social value of faces makes their efficient detection evolutionarily advantageous. It has been suggested that this might occur nonconsciously, but experimental results are equivocal thus far. Here, we probe nonconscious face perception using a novel combination of binocular rivalry with continuous flash suppression, and steady-state visually evoked potentials. In the first two experiments, participants viewed either non-face objects, neutral faces (Study 1), or fearful faces (Study 2). Consistent with the hypothesis that faces are processed nonconsciously, we found that faces broke through suppression faster than objects. We did not, however, observe a concomitant face-selective SSVEP. Study 3 was run to reconcile this paradox. We hypothesized that the faster breakthrough time was due to a mid-level visual feature, curvilinearity, rather than high-level category membership, which would explain the behavioral difference without neural evidence of face-selective processing. We tested this hypothesis by presenting participants with four different groups of stimuli outside of conscious awareness: rectilinear objects (e.g., chessboard), curvilinear objects (e.g., dartboard), faces, and objects that were not dominantly curvilinear or rectilinear. We found that faces and curvilinear objects broke through suppression faster than objects and rectilinear objects. Moreover, there was no difference between faces and curvilinear objects. These results support our hypothesis that the observed behavioral advantage for faces is due to their curvilinearity, rather than category membership.\n\nHighlightsO_LIFaces presented outside of awareness do not evoke a steady-state visually evoked potential.\nC_LIO_LIThis is true for both neutral and fearful faces.\nC_LIO_LIHowever, faces do breakthrough interocular suppression faster than objects.\nC_LIO_LICurvilinear objects breakthrough interocular suppression faster than rectilinear objects.\nC_LIO_LIThe breakthrough time advantage for faces over objects is due to their curvilinearity.\nC_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Field percentile
- top 36%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reverse-breaking CFS (rev-bCFS): Disentangling conscious and unconscious effects by measuring suppression and dominance times during continuous flash suppression
Tommaso Ciorli, Lorenzo Pia, Timo Stein·Consciousness and CognitionPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2025
- Visual periodicity reveals distinct attentional signatures for face and non-face categories
Genevieve L. Quek, Adélaïde de Heering·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·May 14, 2024
- Normal observers show no evidence for blindsight in facial emotion perception
Sivananda Rajananda, Jeanette Zhu, Megan A. K. Peters·Neuroscience of ConsciousnessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Intracranial Markers of Conscious Face Perception in Humans
Fabiano Baroni, Jochem van Kempen, … Naotsugu Tsuchiya·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2017
- Rapid neural categorization of facelike objects predicts the perceptual awareness of a face (face pareidolia)
Diane Rekow, Jean‐Yves Baudouin, … Arnaud Leleu·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Impact of conscious awareness on pupillary response to faces
Yung‐Hao Yang, Hsin‐I Liao, Shigeto Furukawa·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2020