Sign in
EcologyIntegrative Conservation
Peer-reviewed journal article

Rosettes in a matrix: Predicting spatial variation in density of a large felid in a forest-production mosaic

Anish PauliD, Nitish Kumar, Tonmoy Mukherjee, Amir Kumar Chhetri, Aritra KshettryiD

Abstract

Large carnivores are keystone for ecosystems and flagships for conservation efforts but face severe threats globally. Protected Areas are vital for the conservation of these charismatic species along with a host of ecological processes. However, the extent and scope of protected areas for conservation of all threatened species is limited, especially in the global south. Considering larger landscapes that can be compatible with large carnivore conservation goals is an alternative approach to ensure their persistence. This study explores the potential of multi-use landscapes for the persistence of a globally threatened large felid, the leopard. This study investigated the spatial variability of leopard densities across a land-use gradient using spatially explicit capture-recapture framework in a tea-plantation dominated forest-production landscape mosaic. While the density of leopards in this landscape was estimated to be 7.96 {+/-} 1.56 (SE) per 100 km2, significant (p=0.048, t=2.02, df=61) differences in estimates were observed between tea-plantations (11.53 {+/-} 2.72 (SE) leopards per 100 km2) and the forested habitats (4.67 {+/-} 2.07 (SE) per 100 km2). Densities between tea plantations and Protected Areas (a subset of the forested habitat) were found to be comparable (9.19 {+/-} 4.55 (SE) per 100 km2). The study posits that conservation-compatible land use in landscapes shared with people can host a higher density of large felids than forested areas and that conservation planning needs to move beyond the dominant PA-centric paradigm. The study also reinforces the importance of multi-use landscapes for wildlife conservation, especially for an adaptable large felid.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
5
FWCI
1.20
Field percentile
top 23%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHavmoller '18Sharma '20Müller '21Farhadinia '20Sondagar '26Gebo '21
79% semantic matchEcology
R. W. Havmoller, S. Tenan, N. Scharff+1 more·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2018