Neural markers of speech comprehension: measuring EEG tracking of linguistic speech representations, controlling the speech acoustics
Marlies GillisiD, Jonas VanthornhoutiD, Jonathan Z. SimoniD, Tom FrancartiD, Christian Brodbeck
Abstract
When listening to speech, our brain responses time-lock to acoustic events in the stimulus. Recent studies have also reported that cortical responses track linguistic representations of speech. However, tracking of these representations is often described without controlling for acoustic properties. Therefore, the response to these linguistic representations might reflect unaccounted acoustic processing rather than language processing. Here, we evaluated the potential of several recently proposed linguistic representations as neural markers of speech comprehension. To do so, we investigated EEG responses to audiobook speech of 29 participants (22 [female]). We examined whether these representations contribute unique information over and beyond acoustic neural tracking and each other. Indeed, not all of these linguistic representations were significantly tracked after controlling for acoustic properties. However, phoneme surprisal, cohort entropy, word surprisal, and word frequency were all significantly tracked over and beyond acoustic properties. We also tested the generality of the associated responses by training on one story and testing on another. In general, the linguistic representations are tracked similarly across different stories spoken by different readers. These results suggests that these representations characterize processing of the linguistic content of speech. Significance StatementFor clinical applications it would be desirable to develop a neural marker of speech comprehension derived from neural responses to continuous speech. Such a measure would allow for behaviour-free evaluation of speech understanding; this would open doors towards better quantification of speech understanding in populations from whom obtaining behavioral measures may be difficult, such as young children or people with cognitive impairments, to allow better targeted interventions and better fitting of hearing devices.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 136
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Heard or understood? Neural tracking of language features in a comprehensible story, an incomprehensible story and a word list
Marlies Gillis, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Electrophysiological indices of hierarchical speech processing differentially reflect the comprehension of speech in noise
Shyanthony R. Synigal, Andrew James Anderson, Edmund C. Lalor·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2026
- Speech understanding oppositely affectsacoustic and linguistic neural tracking in aspeech rate manipulation paradigm.
Eline Verschueren, Marlies Gillis, … Tom Francart·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2022
- A tradeoff between acoustic and linguistic feature encoding in spoken language comprehension
Filiz Tezcan, Hugo Weissbart, Andrea E. Martin·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2023
- Neural tracking of speech does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility
Anne Kösem, Bohan Dai, … Peter Hagoort A·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2022
- Phoneme-level processing in low-frequency cortical responses to speech explained by acoustic features
Christoph Daube, Robin A. A. Ince, Joachim Groß·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2019