Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Speech understanding oppositely affectsacoustic and linguistic neural tracking in aspeech rate manipulation paradigm.
Eline VerschuereniD, Marlies GillisiD, Lien P. DecruyiD, Jonas VanthornhoutiD, Tom FrancartiD
Abstract
When listening to continuous speech, the human brain can track features of the presented speech signal. It has been shown that neural tracking of acoustic features is a prerequisite for speech understanding and can predict speech understanding in controlled circumstances. However, the brain also tracks linguistic features of speech, which may be more directly related to speech understanding. We investigated acoustic and linguistic speech processing as a function of varying speech understanding by manipulating the speech rate. In this paradigm, acoustic and linguistic speech processing are affected simultaneously but in opposite directions: When the speech rate increases, more acoustic information per second is present. In contrast, the tracking of linguistic information becomes more challenging when speech is less intelligible at higher speech rates. We measured the EEG of 18 participants (4 male) who listened to speech at various speech rates. As expected and confirmed by the behavioral results, speech understanding decreased with increasing speech rate. Accordingly, linguistic neural tracking decreased with increasing speech rate, but acoustic neural tracking increased. This indicates that neural tracking of linguistic representations can capture the gradual effect of decreasing speech understanding. In addition, increased acoustic neural tracking does not necessarily imply better speech understanding. This suggests that, although more challenging to measure due to the low signal-to-noise ratio, linguistic neural tracking may be a more direct predictor of speech understanding. Significance statementAn increasingly popular method to investigate neural speech processing is to measure neural tracking. Although much research has been done on how the brain tracks acoustic speech features, linguistic speech features have received less attention. In this study, we disentangled acoustic and linguistic characteristics of neural speech tracking via manipulating the speech rate. A proper way of objectively measuring auditory and language processing paves the way towards clinical applications: An objective measure of speech understanding would allow for behavioral-free evaluation of speech understanding, which allows to evaluate hearing loss and adjust hearing aids based on brain responses. This objective measure would benefit populations from whom obtaining behavioral measures may be complex, such as young children or people with cognitive impairments.
- Citations
- 47
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural tracking of speech does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility
Anne Kösem, Bohan Dai, … Peter Hagoort A·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2022
- Heard or understood? Neural tracking of language features in a comprehensible story, an incomprehensible story and a word list
Marlies Gillis, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Neural speech tracking shifts from the syllabic to the modulation rate of speech as intelligibility decreases
Fabian Schmidt, Ya‐Ping Chen, … Nathan Weisz·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2023
- Effect of task and attention on neural tracking of speech
Jonas Vanthornhout, Lien P. Decruy, Tom Francart·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2019
- Neural markers of speech comprehension: measuring EEG tracking of linguistic speech representations, controlling the speech acoustics
Marlies Gillis, Jonas Vanthornhout, … Christian Brodbeck·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2021
- Neural tracking of linguistic speech representations decreases with advancing age
Marlies Gillis, Jill Kries, … Tom Francart·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2022