Prediction of standard cell types and functional markers from flow cytometry gating definitions using machine learning
Raul Rodriguez‐EstebaniD, José Duarte, Priscila Camillo TeixeiraiD, Fabien Richard, Svetlana Koltsova, W. Venus So
Abstract
BackgroundA key step in clinical flow cytometry data analysis is gating, which involves the identification of cell populations. The process of gating produces a set of reportable results, which are typically described by gating definitions. The non-standardized, non-interpreted nature of gating definitions represents a hurdle for data interpretation and data sharing across and within organizations. Interpreting and standardizing gating definitions for subsequent analysis of gating results requires a curation effort from experts. Machine learning approaches have the potential to help in this process by predicting expert annotations associated with gating definitions. MethodsWe created a gold-standard dataset by manually annotating thousands of gating definitions with cell type and functional marker annotations. We used this dataset to train and test a machine learning pipeline able to predict standard cell types and functional marker genes associated with gating definitions. ResultsThe machine learning pipeline predicted annotations with high accuracy for both cell types and functional marker genes. Accuracy was lower for gating definitions from assays belonging to laboratories from which limited or no prior data was available in the training. Manual error review ensured that resulting predicted annotations could be reused subsequently as additional gold-standard training data. ConclusionsMachine learning methods are able to consistently predict annotations associated with gating definitions from flow cytometry assays. However, a hybrid automatic and manual annotation workflow would be recommended to achieve optimal results.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Field percentile
- 34th percentile
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- FLAG-X: Hybrid machine learning workflows for automated gating of clinical flow cytometry data
Paul Martini, Marziyeh Mohammadi, … Stefan W. Krause·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2026
- CytoGate-Bench: an LLM benchmark for cross-panel cell gating in cytometry
Jaesik Kim, Byounghan Lee, … Dokyoon Kim·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2026
- MUDflow: Combining Neural Networks, UMAP and DBM Clustering to Identify Cell Populations Accurately, Quickly and Easily in Mass and Fluorescence Cytometry
Connor Meehan, Stephen Meehan, … Leonore A. Herzenberg·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2025
- CyAnno: A semi-automated approach for cell type annotation of mass cytometry datasets
Abhinav Kaushik, Diane Dunham, … Sandra Andorf·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021
- ConvexGating infers gating strategies from clusters in single cell cytometry data
Vincent D. Friedrich, Karola Mai, … Maren Büttner·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- Gating mass cytometry data by deep learning
Huamin Li, Uri Shaham, … Yuval Kluger·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2017