bioRxivMicrobiology
Surveillance of Vermont wildlife in 2021-2022 reveals no detected SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA
H. W. Despres, M. G. Mills, M. M. Schmidt, J. Gov, Y. Perez, M. Jindrich, A. M. L. Crawford, W. T. Kohl, E. Rosenblatt, H. C. Kubinski, B. C. Simmons, M. C. Nippes, A. J. Goldenberg, K. E. Murtha, S. Nicoloro, M. J. Harris, A. C. Feeley, T. K. Gelinas, M. K. Cronin, R. S. Frederick, M. Thomas, M. E. Johnson, J. Murphy, E. B. Lenzini, P. A. Carr, , Rocka
Abstract
Previous studies have documented natural infections of SARS-CoV-2 in various domestic and wild animals. More recently, studies have been published noting the susceptibility of members of the Cervidae family, and infections in both wild and captive cervid populations. In this study, we investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in mammalian wildlife within the state of Vermont. 739 nasal or throat samples were collected from wildlife throughout the state during the 2021 and 2022 harvest season. Data was collected from red and gray foxes (Vulpes vulples and Urocyon cineroargentus, respectively), fishers (Martes pennati), river otters (Lutra canadensis), coyotes (Canis lantrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus rufus), black bears (Ursus americanus), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 via quantitative RT-qPCR using the CDC N1/N2 primer set and/or the WHO-E gene primer set. Our results indicate that no sampled wildlife were positive for SARS-CoV-2. This finding is surprising, given that most published North America studies have found SARS-CoV-2 within their deer populations. The absence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in populations sampled here may provide insights in to the various environmental and anthropogenic factors that reduce spillover and spread in North Americans wildlife populations.
- organism: mouse
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Absence of SARS-CoV-2 in Wildlife of Northeastern Minnesota and Isle Royale National Park
D. Castaneda, E. J. Isaac, … M. Aliota·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2023
- SARS-CoV-2 wildlife surveillance in Ontario and Quebec, Canada
J. E. Greenhorn, J. D. Kotwa, … S. Mubareka·Canada Communicable Disease ReportPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2022
- Wild red deer (Cervus elaphus) do not play a role as vectors or reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 in north-eastern Poland.
M. Krupinska, J. Borkowski, … M. Grzybek·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2022
- Multiple spillovers and onward transmission of SARS-Cov-2 in free-living and captive White-tailed deer
S. V. Kuchipudi, M. Surendran-Nair, … V. Kapur·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2021
- Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in Ohio's wildlife, companion, and agricultural animals
M. Ehrlich, C. Madden, … V. L. Hale·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2022
- Testing for a wildlife reservoir of divergent SARS-CoV-2 in white-tailed deer
Lauren Crawshaw, Jonathon D. Kotwa, … Jeff Bowman·FACETSPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026