Ligand Binding Free Energy Evaluation by Monte Carlo Recursion
Abstract
The correct evaluation of ligand binding free energies by computational methods is still a very challenging active area of research. The most employed methods for these calculations can be roughly classified into four groups: (i) the fastest and less accurate methods, such as molecular docking, designed to sample a large number of molecules and rapidly rank them according to the potential binding energy; (ii) the second class of methods use a thermodynamic ensemble, typically generated by molecular dynamics, to analyze the endpoints of the thermodynamic cycle for binding and extract differences, in the so-called end-point methods; (iii) the third class of methods is based on the Zwanzig relationship and computes the free energy difference after a chemical change of the system (alchemical methods); and (iv) methods based on biased simulations, such as metadynamics, for example. These methods require increased computational power and as expected, result in increased accuracy for the determination of the strength of binding. Here, we describe an intermediate approach, based on the Monte Carlo Recursion (MCR) method first developed by Harold Scheraga. In this method, the system is sampled at increasing effective temperatures, and the free energy of the system is assessed from a series of terms W(b, T), computed from Monte Carlo (MC) averages at each iteration. We show the application of the MCR for ligand binding with datasets of guest-hosts systems (N=75) and we observed that a good correlation is obtained between experimental data and the binding energies computed with MCR. We also compared the experimental data with an end-point calculation from equilibrium Monte Carlo calculations that allowed us to conclude that the lower-energy (lower-temperature) terms in the calculation are the most relevant to the estimation of the binding energies, resulting in similar correlations between MCR and MC data and the experimental values. On the other hand, the MCR method provides a reasonable view of the binding energy funnel, with possible connections with the ligand binding kinetics, as well. The codes developed for this analysis are publicly available on GitHub as a part of the LiBELa/MCLiBELa project (https://github.com/alessandronascimento/LiBELa).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: Assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations
A. Rizzi, T. Jensen, … J. D. Chodera·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2020
- Comparative Analysis of Relative Ligand Binding Free Energy Simulation Methods: Amber-TI, GROMACS-NETI, OpenMM-FEP, and BLaDE-MSLD
Hajin Lee, In Jung Kim, … Wonpil Im·Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2026
- An Accurate Free Energy Method for Solvation of Organic Compounds and Binding to Proteins
O. Tayfuroglu, M. Yildiz, … A. Kocak·bioRxiv·May 26, 2020
- Ligand Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (LiGaMD): Characterization of ligand binding thermodynamics and kinetics
Y. Miao, A. Bhattarai, J. Wang·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2020
- Assessing computational strategies for the evaluation of antibody binding affinities.
Ida Autiero, Damiano Buratto, … Francesco Zonta·Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2025
- Binding Affinity Estimation From Restrained Umbrella Sampling Simulations
V. Govind Kumar, S. Agrawal, … M. Moradi·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2021