Curiosity satisfaction increases event-related potentials sensitive to reward
Tim Rüterbories, Axel MecklingeriD, Kathrin C. J. EschmanniD, Jordan E. Crivelli-DeckeriD, Charan Ranganath AiD, Matthias J. GruberiD
Abstract
Successful learning depends on various factors such as depth of processing, motivation, or curiosity about information. A strong drive to learn something or the expectation of receiving a reward can be crucial to enhance learning. However, the influence of curiosity on the processing of new information and its similarity with reward processing is not well understood. This study examined whether states of curiosity influence specific event-related-potentials (ERPs) associated with reward processing and whether these ERPs are related with later memory benefits. In an initial screening phase, participants indicated their curiosity and confidence in prior knowledge about answers to various trivia questions. In a subsequent study phase, we targeted different time windows related to reward processing during the presentation of trivia answers containing the Reward-Positivity (RewP; 250 - 350 ms), the P3 (250 - 500 ms), and the Late-Positive-Potential (LPP; 600 - 1000 ms). In a following surprise memory test, we found that participants recalled more high- than low-curiosity answers. The RewP, P3 and LPP showed greater positive mean amplitudes for high compared to low curiosity, reflecting increased reward processing. In addition, we found that the RewP and the P3 showed more positive mean amplitudes for later recalled compared to later forgotten answers, but curiosity did not modulate this encoding-related results. These findings support the view that the satisfaction of curiosity resembles reward processing, indicated by event-related-potentials.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Effects of Learnability and Reward Responsiveness on Reward Processing
Abigail Oloriz, Olave E. Krigolson, Cameron Dale Hassall·bioRxiv·May 22, 2026
- Induction and Relief of Curiosity Elicit Parietal and Frontal Activity
Lieke L. F. van Lieshout, Annelinde R. E. Vandenbroucke, … Floris P. de Lange·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2018
- Broad Brain Networks Support Curiosity-Motivated Incidental Learning Of Naturalistic Dynamic Stimuli With And Without Monetary Incentives
Stefanie Meliß, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, … Kou Murayama·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2024
- Curiosity, latent learning, and cognitive maps
Maya Zhe Wang, Benjamin Y. Hayden·Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2020
- Experiencing surprise: the temporal dynamics of its impact on memory
Darya Frank, Alex Kafkas, Daniela Montaldi·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2022
- Reward evokes visual perceptual learning following reinforcement rules
Zhiyan Wang, Dongho Kim, … Takeo Watanabe·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2019