Sign in
GenomicsBMC Genomics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Novel metrics for quantifying bacterial genome composition skews

Lena M. Joesch-CoheniD, Max RobinsoniD, Neda JabbariiD, Christopher G. LaustediD, Gustavo GlusmaniD

Abstract

BackgroundBacterial genomes have characteristic compositional skews, which are differences in nucleotide frequency between the leading and lagging DNA strands across a segment of a genome. It is thought that these strand asymmetries arise as a result of mutational biases and selective constraints, particularly for energy efficiency. Analysis of compositional skews in a diverse set of bacteria provides a comparative context in which mutational and selective environmental constraints can be studied. These analyses typically require finished and well-annotated genomic sequences.\n\nResultsWe present three novel metrics for examining genome composition skews; all three metrics can be computed for unfinished or partially-annotated genomes. The first two metrics, (dot-skew and cross-skew) depend on sequence and gene annotation of a single genome, while the third metric (residual skew) highlights unusual genomes by subtracting a GC content-based model of a library of genome sequences. We applied these metrics to all 7738 available bacterial genomes, including partial drafts, and identified outlier species. A number of these outliers (i.e., Borrelia, Ehrlichia, Kinetoplastibacterium, and Phytoplasma) display similar skew patterns despite only distant phylogenetic relationship. While unrelated, some of the outlier bacterial species share lifestyle characteristics, in particular intracellularity and biosynthetic dependence on their hosts.\n\nConclusionsOur novel metrics appear to reflect the effects of biosynthetic constraints and adaptations to life within one or more hosts on genome composition. We provide results for each analyzed genome, software and interactive visualizations at http://db.systemsbiology.net/gestalt/skew_metrics.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLu '20Sahu '26Hubert '21Muscarella '20Chen '19Gralka '22
70% semantic matchGenomics
Jennifer Lu, Steven L. Salzberg·PLoS Computational Biology·Dec 4, 2020· 75 citations