bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Impact of structural sampling, coupling scheme and state of interest on the energy transfer in CP29
Abstract
The Qy and Bx excitation energy transfer (EET) in the minor light harvesting complex CP29 (LHCII B4.1) antenna complex of Pisum sativum was characterized using a computational approach. We applied Forster theory (FRET) and the transition density cube (TDC) method estimating the Coulombic coupling, based on a combination of classical molecular dynamics and QM/MM calculations. Employing TDC instead of FRET mostly affects the EET between chlorophylls (Chls) and carotenoids (Crts), as expected due to the Crts being spatially more challenging for FRET. Only between Chls, effects are found to be small (about only 0.1 EET efficiency change when introducing TDC instead of FRET). Effects of structural sampling were found to be small, illustrated by a small average standard deviation for the Qy state coupling elements (FRET/TDC: 0.97/0.94 cm-1). Due to the higher flexibility of the Bx state, the corresponding deviations are larger (FRET/TDC between Chl-Chl pairs: 17.58/22.67 cm-1, between Crt-Chl pairs: 62.58/31.63 cm-1). In summary, it was found for the Q band that the coupling between Chls varies only slightly depending on FRET or TDC, resulting in a minute effect on EET acceptor preference. In contrast, the coupling in the B band spectral region is found to be more affected. Here, the S2 (1Bu) states of the spatially challenging Crts may act as acceptors in addition to the Chl B states. Depending on FRET or TDC, several Chls show different Chl-to-Crt couplings. Interestingly, the EET between Chls or Crts in the B band is found to often outcompete the corresponding decay processes. The individual efficiencies for B band EET to Crts vary however strongly with the chosen coupling scheme (e.g., up to 0.29/0.99 FRET/TDC efficiency for the Chl a604/neoxanthin pair). Thus, the choice of coupling scheme must involve a consideration of the state of interest.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Excitation energy transfer between higher excited states of photosynthetic pigments: 1. Carotenoids facilitate B -> Q band conversion in chlorophylls
J. P. Götze, H. Lokstein·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2023
- Excitation energy transfer between higher excited states of photosynthetic pigments: 2. Chlorophyll b is a B band energy trap
J. P. Gotze, H. Lokstein·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2023
- Multi-Scale Simulations of Excited-State Energy Transfer Pathways in the C2S2-Type PSII-LHCII Supercomplex of Spinach
Jian-Ping Guo, Fan Xu, … Jun Gao·Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Biosynthesis of minimal C-phycocyanin chromophore assemblies in E. coli provides a platform to dissect protein-mediated tuning of exciton transfer
Deborah L. Zhuang, Derrick S. Chuang, … Matthew B. Francis·Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2026
- Lateral organization of cytochrome b6f in thylakoid membranes controls photosynthetic electron transfer efficiency
Afifa Zaeem, Davide Tamborrini, … Felix E. Buchert·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Modeling the photosynthetic system I as complex interacting network
Daniele Montepietra, Michele Bellingeri, … Davide Cassi·bioRxiv·May 2, 2020