VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Automated Analysis Pipeline for Extracting Saccade, Pupil, and Blink Parameters Using Video-Based Eye Tracking
Brian C. CoeiD, Jeff C. H. HuangiD, Donald C. BrieniD, Brian J. WhiteiD, Rachel YepiD, Douglas P. MunoziD
Abstract
The tremendous increase of video-based eye tracking has made it possible to collect data from thousands of participants. Traditional manual detection and classification procedures for saccades and trial categorization is not viable for the large data sets being collected. Additionally, high-speed video-based eye trackers now allow for the novel analysis of pupil responses and blink behavior. Here we present a detailed description of our pipeline for collecting data, storing data, organizing participant codes, and cleaning data, which are fairly lab-specific but nonetheless important precursory steps in establishing standardized pipelines. More importantly, we also include descriptions of the automated detection and classification of saccades, blinks, blincades (blinks occurring during saccades), and boomerang saccades (two saccades in opposite directions that occur almost simultaneously so that speed-based algorithms fail to split them), which are almost entirely task-agnostic and can be used on a wide variety of data. We additionally describe novel findings about post-saccadic oscillations, and provide a method to get more accurate estimates for end-points of saccades. Lastly, we describe the automated behavior classification for the Interleaved Pro- and Anti-Saccade Task (IPAST), a well-known task that probes voluntary and inhibitory control. This pipeline was evaluated using data collected from 592 human participants between 5 and 93 years of age, making it robust enough to handle large clinical patient data sets as well. In sum, this pipeline has been optimized to consistently handle large data sets obtained from diverse study cohorts (i.e., development, aging, clinical), and collected across multiple laboratory sites.
- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Definition, modeling and detection of saccades in the face of post-saccadic oscillations
Richard Schweitzer, Martin Rolfs·NeuromethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- REMoDNaV: Robust Eye-Movement Classification for Dynamic Stimulation
Asim H. Dar, Adina Svenja Wagner, Michael Hanke·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2020
- Extracting Saccades From Eye Movements Triggered By Reflex Blinks
Uday K. Jagadisan, Neeraj J. Gandhi·bioRxiv·May 2, 2017
- Systematic Classification Differences Across Eye-Movement Detection Algorithms
Jonathan Nir, Leon Y. Deouell·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2026
- Boundaries in the eyes: measure event segmentation during naturalistic video watching using eye tracking
Jiashen Li, Zhengyue Chen, … Wei Liu·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2025
- Learning to blink strategically is crucial to performance in a predictable saccade task and varies across the lifespan
Isabell C. Pitigoi, Donald C. Brien, … Douglas P. Munoz·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026