Sign in
NeuroscienceBehavior Research Methods
Peer-reviewed journal article

Boundaries in the eyes: measure event segmentation during naturalistic video watching using eye tracking

Jiashen LiiD, Zhengyue Chen, Xin HaoiD, Wei LiuiD

Abstract

During naturalistic information processing, individuals spontaneously segment their continuous experiences into discrete events, a phenomenon known as event segmentation. Traditional methods for assessing this process, which include subjective reports and neuroimaging techniques, often disrupt real-time segmentation or are costly and time intensive. Our study investigated the potential of measuring event segmentation by recording and analyzing eye movements while participants view naturalistic videos. We collected eye movement data from healthy young adults as they watched commercial films (N=104), or online Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) educational courses (N=44). We analyzed changes in pupil size and eye movement speed near event boundaries and employed inter-subject correlation analysis (ISC) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to identify patterns indicative of event segmentation. We observed that both the speed of eye movements and pupil size dynamically responded to event boundaries, exhibiting heightened sensitivity to high-strength boundaries. Our analyses further revealed that event boundaries synchronized eye movements across participants. These boundaries, can be effectively identified by HMM, yielded higher within-event similarity values and aligned with human-annotated boundaries. Importantly, HMM-based event segmentation metrics responded to experimental manipulations and predicted learning outcomes. This study provided a comprehensive computational framework for measuring event segmentation using eye-tracking. With the widespread accessibility of low-cost eye-tracking devices, the ability to measure event segmentation from eye movement data promises to deepen our understanding of this process in diverse real-world settings.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
5
FWCI
2.27
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISEisenberg '18Li '24Dar '20Khodami '25Sava‐Segal '23Coe '24
63% semantic matchNeuroscience
Michelle L. Eisenberg, Jeffrey M. Zacks, Shaney E. Flores·Cognitive Research Principles and Implications·Dec 1, 2018· 39 citations