NeuropsychologiaNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Behavioral investigation of allocentric and egocentric cognitive maps in human spatial memory
Laura NettiD, Tim A GuthiD, Philipp K. Büchel, Nuttida RungratsameetaweemanaiD, Lukas KunziD
Abstract
Spatial memory is a fundamental cognitive function that enables humans and other species to encode and recall the locations of items in their environments. Humans employ diverse strategies to support spatial memory, including the use of cognitive maps. Cognitive maps are mental representations of the environment that organize its content along two or more continuous dimensions. In allocentric cognitive maps, these dimensions form a Cartesian coordinate system referenced to the environment. In egocentric cognitive maps, the dimensions form a polar coordinate system centered on the subject. To better understand how humans employ allocentric and egocentric cognitive maps for spatial memory, we performed a behavioral study with a novel task designed to directly and explicitly assess both types of cognitive maps. During encoding periods, participants navigated through a virtual environment and encountered objects at different locations. During recall periods, participants aimed at remembering these locations in abstract allocentric and egocentric coordinate systems. Our results show that relationships between the objects and the environment, such as their distance to boundaries and corners, were associated with allocentric memory performance. Relationships between the objects and the participant, including their distance and orientation to the participants starting position, were linked to egocentric memory performance. Spatial feedback during recall supported performance within allocentric and egocentric domains, but not across domains. These findings are compatible with the notion that allocentric and egocentric cognitive maps operate as (partially) independent systems for spatial memory, each specialized in processing specific types of spatial relationships.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Field percentile
- top 28%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory
Jacob L. S. Bellmund, William de Cothi, … Christian F. Doeller·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2019
- Living off the grid: Spatial representations show systematic non-Euclidean distortions regardless of their age and how measured
Derek J. Huffman, Arne D. Ekstrom, Nikhil Jaha·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2026
- Mental search of concepts is supported by egocentric vector representations and restructured grid maps
Simone Viganò, Rena Bayramova, … Roberto Bottini·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2023
- Egocentric cues influence the spatial memory of landmark configurations for memory-guided actions
Pierre-Pascal Forster, Katja Fiehler, Harun Karimpur·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2023
- Change-resistance distinguishes the representational geometries of human spatial memory and mouse CA1 in deformed environments
Diana M. Green, David G. Behery, … Alexandra T. Keinath·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025
- Navigation task and action space drive the emergence of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations
Sandhiya Vijayabaskaran, Sen Cheng·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2022