bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Change-resistance distinguishes the representational geometries of human spatial memory and mouse CA1 in deformed environments
Diana M. Green, David G. Behery, Rachel E. Barrett, Viktor H. Klimczyk, Michael Pigin, Sergio A. Pecirno, Alexandra T. KeinathiD
Abstract
Prior work has highlighted qualitative similarities between the neural instantiations of cognitive maps in rodents and memory-guided navigation in humans, suggesting a conservation of representational structure across species. Yet evidence of cross-species differences in neural coding continues to mount. Our ability to reconcile these similarities and differences has been inherently limited by the qualitative nature of our cross-species comparisons. To overcome this limitation, here we combine recent technical and theoretical advances to characterize the representational geometry of human spatial memory during a diverse set of environmental deformations and compare this geometry to that of mouse CA1. Across three untethered immersive virtual reality experiments (n > 100 participants per experiment), we find that deformations induce compounding local distortions in human spatial memory. These distortions yield a representational geometry which closely resembles a change-resistant version of that of mouse hippocampal CA1 during analogous deformations. The geometries of mouse CA1 subpopulations with higher firing rates, spatial tuning stability, and spatial tuning specificity all better resembled that of human spatial memory. The precision, but not accuracy, of human spatial memory also modulated cross-species resemblance. The local impact of deformations scaled up when humans navigated a larger environment, preserving representational geometry and cross-species resemblance. Neither geometry nor cross-species resemblance depended on the human visual advantage during retrieval. Together, these results establish a common cross-species resemblance in the representational geometry of mouse CA1 and human spatial memory during environmental deformations, with a notable difference in the resistance to change between these assays.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: imaging
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory
Jacob L. S. Bellmund, William de Cothi, … Christian F. Doeller·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2019
- Locomotion-dependent use of geometric and body cues in humans mapping 3D space
Volker Reisner, Theo A. J. Schäfer, … Christian F. Doeller·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- Comparable human spatial memory distortions in physical, desktop virtual and immersive virtual environments
Fiona Zisch, Coco Newton, … Hugo J. Spiers·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Living off the grid: Spatial representations show systematic non-Euclidean distortions regardless of their age and how measured
Derek J. Huffman, Arne D. Ekstrom, Nikhil Jaha·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2026
- Behavioral investigation of allocentric and egocentric cognitive maps in human spatial memory
Laura Nett, Tim A Guth, … Lukas Kunz·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2025
- Identifying representational structure in CA1 to benchmark theoretical models of cognitive mapping
J. Quinn Lee, Alexandra T. Keinath, … Mark P. Brandon·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2024