Spatial instability affects Key Biodiversity Areas scoping for bumblebees across three decades
Dario NaniaiD, Andrea CristianoiD, Maurizio MeiiD, Denis MicheziD, Michele Di MuscianoiD, Roberto Cazzolla GattiiD, Paola MerelliiD, Michela PacificiiD, Carlo RondininiiD, Pierfilippo CerrettiiD
Abstract
Identifying potential Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) using species occurrence records is crucial for integrating hyperdiverse taxa, such as insects, into the KBA network. To ensure the KBA network supports effective conservation decision-making, established KBAs need to be reassessed every 8 to 12 years. Realistically, reassessments for very high numbers of species will be based also on opportunistic occurrence points. However, how changes in species distribution data availability and completeness in different time periods influence the spatial stability of potential KBAs over time has not been investigated in any taxa yet. We performed potential KBA assessments for 28 species and subspecies of bumblebees in Italy using an expert-validated dataset of distribution data collected between 1990 and 2023, using 10-year cumulative and progressive time series. Our findings reveal that KBA scoping for species with distributional knowledge gaps does not ensure stability and reliability over time. Potential KBA turnover percentages between different time periods can be high ([~=]133%). While only seven species/subspecies could trigger potential KBAs, their turnover percentage ranged between 28.5% and 50%. We highlight the need for standardized and strategic monitoring of established KBAs and species distributions between reassessments. We also discuss strategies to optimize monitoring plans under resource constraints.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neglected predatory insects trigger potential Key Biodiversity Areas in threatened coastal habitats
Aleida Ascenzi, Dario Nania, … Pierfilippo Cerretti·Biodiversity and ConservationPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2025
- Opportunities and challenges for applying Key BiodiversityAreas Criterion E at large spatial scales
Giordano Mancini, Marta Cimatti, … Moreno Di Marco·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2025
- An automated approach for systematic detection of Key Biodiversity Areas
D. Nania, G. F. Ficetola, … C. Rondinini·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2023
- A call for improving the Key Biodiversity Areas framework
H. Farooq, A. Antonelli, S. Faurby·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2022
- Decades of native bee biodiversity surveys at Pinnacles National Park highlight the importance of monitoring natural areas over time
J. Meiners, T. L. Griswold, O. M. Carril·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2018
- Under-sampled KBAs, over-sampled roadsides: integrating historical and contemporary records of Malagasy bees
Damselle Quesada, Nicolas Leclercq, … Nicolas J. Vereecken·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026