Briefings in BioinformaticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data
Arjun BhattacharyaiD, Alina M. HamiltoniD, Helena F. FurbergiD, Eugene J. PietzakiD, Mark P. PurdueiD, Melissa A. TroesteriD, Katherine A. HoadleyiD, Michael I. LoveiD
Abstract
The NanoString RNA counting assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples is unique in its sensitivity, technical reproducibility, and robustness for analysis of clinical and archival samples. While commercial normalization methods are provided by NanoString, they are not optimal for all settings, particularly when samples exhibit strong technical or biological variation or where housekeeping genes have variable performance across the cohort. Here, we develop and evaluate a more comprehensive normalization procedure for NanoString data with steps for quality control, selection of housekeeping targets, normalization, and iterative data visualization and biological validation. The approach was evaluated using a large cohort (N = 1,649) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, two cohorts of moderate sample size (N = 359 and 130), and a small published dataset (N = 12). The iterative process developed here eliminates technical variation (e.g. from different study phases or sites) more reliably than the three other methods, including NanoStrings commercial package, without diminishing biological variation, especially in long-term longitudinal multi-phase or multi-site cohorts. We also find that probe sets validated for nCounter, such as the PAM50 gene signature, are impervious to batch issues. This work emphasizes that systematic quality control, normalization, and visualization of NanoString nCounter data is an imperative component of study design that influences results in downstream analyses.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 122
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A new normalization for the Nanostring nCounter gene expression assay
Ramyar Molania, Johann A. Gagnon-Bartsch, … Terence Paul Speed·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 7, 2019
- MetaNorm: Incorporating Meta-analytic Priors into Normalization of NanoString nCounter Data
Jackson Barth, Yuqiu Yang, … Xinlei Wang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Know your RNA-Seq data in depth: a case study using data from early life stress in mouse
Angelica Lindlöf·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2025
- When to use Quantile Normalization?
Stephanie C. Hicks, Rafael A. Irizarry·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2014
- Evaluation of RNA-seq normalization methods using challenging datasets
Severin Uebbing·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2018
- A Comparison of Methods: Normalizing High-Throughput RNA Sequencing Data
Rahul Reddy·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2015