Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: priority-map- or dimension-based inhibition?
Bei ZhangiD, Fredrik AllenmarkiD, Heinrich R. LiesefeldiD, Zhuanghua ShiiD, Hermann J. MülleriD
Abstract
Observers can learn the likely locations of salient distractors in visual search, reducing their potential to capture attention (Ferrante et al., 2018; Sauter et al., 2018a; Wang & Theeuwes, 2018a). While there is agreement that this involves positional suppression of the likely distractor location(s), it is contentious at which stage of search guidance the suppression operates: the supra-dimensional priority map or feature-contrast signals within the distractor dimension. On the latter account, advocated by Sauter et al., target processing should be unaffected by distractor suppression when the target is defined in a different (non-suppressed) dimension to the target. At odds with this, Wang and Theeuwes found strong suppression not only of the (color) distractor, but also of the (shape) target when it appeared at the likely distractor location. Adopting their paradigm, the present study ruled out that increased cross-trial inhibition of the single frequent (frequently inhibited) as compared to any of the rare (rarely inhibited) distractor locations is responsible for this target-location effect. However, a reduced likelihood of the target appearing at the frequent vs. a rare distractor location contributes to this effect: removing this negative bias abolished the cost to target processing with increasing practice, indicative of a transition from priority-map- to dimension-based - and thus a flexible locus of - distractor suppression.\n\nPublic Significance StatementDistraction by a salient visual stimulus outside the focus of the task at hand occurs frequently. The present study examined whether and how knowledge of the likely location(s) where the distractors occur helps the observer to mitigate distraction. The results confirmed that observers can learn to suppress distracting stimuli at likely locations. Further, they showed that, the suppression may occur at different levels in the hierarchically organized visual system where the priorities of which objects to be attended in the environment are determined.
- Citations
- 56
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pinging the Hidden Attentional Priority Map: Suppression Needs Attention
Changrun Huang, Dirk van Moorselaar, … Jan Theeuwes·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2024
- Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency
Fredrik Allenmark, Bei Zhang, … Hermann J. Müller·Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformancePeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2022
- Pre-search attentional focus supports learned suppression in visual search
Yinfei Zhou, Lishuang Wang, … Benchi Wang·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Statistical learning of frequent distractor locations in visual search involves regional signal suppression in early visual cortex
Bei Zhang, Ralph Weidner, … Hermann J. Müller·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2021
- Spatially guided distractor suppression during visual search
Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, Marina Weinberger, Edward Awh·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2021
- Rapid inversion of singleton distractor representations underlies learned attentional suppression
Ziyao Zhang, Jarrod A. Lewis‐Peacock·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026