Spatially guided distractor suppression during visual search
Tobias Feldmann‐WüstefeldiD, Marina WeinbergeriD, Edward AwhiD
Abstract
Past work has demonstrated that active suppression of salient distractors is a critical part of visual selection. Evidence for goal-driven suppression includes below-baseline visual encoding at the position of salient distractors (Gaspelin and Luck, 2015) and neural signals such as the Pd that track the position and number of distractors in the visual field (Feldmann-Wustefeld and Vogel, 2019). One basic question regarding distractor suppression is whether it is inherently spatial or nonspatial in character. Indeed, past work has shown that distractors evoke both spatial (Theeuwes, 1992) and nonspatial forms of interference (Folk and Remington, 1998), motivating a direct examination of whether space is integral to goal-driven distractor suppression. Here, we provide clear evidence for a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient singleton distractors. Replicating past work, both reaction time and neural indices of target selection improved monotonically as the distance between target and distractor increased. Importantly, these target selection effects were paralleled by a monotonic decline in the amplitude of the Pd, an electrophysiological index of distractor suppression. Moreover, multivariate analyses revealed spatially selective activity in the theta band that tracked the position of the target and - critically - revealed suppressed activity at spatial channels centered on distractor positions. Thus, goal-driven selection of relevant over irrelevant information benefits from a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient distractors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 51
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural mechanisms underlying distractor suppression guided by spatial cues
Chenguang Zhao, Yuanjun Kong, … Yan Song·bioRxiv·May 22, 2022
- Electrophysiological indices of distractor processing in visual search are shaped by target expectations.
Dirk van Moorselaar, Changrun Huang, Jan Theeuwes·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Distractor suppression does and does not depend on pre-distractor alpha-band activity
Zach V. Redding, Ian C. Fiebelkorn·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 10, 2024
- Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: priority-map- or dimension-based inhibition?
Bei Zhang, Fredrik Allenmark, … Hermann J. Müller·Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformancePeer-reviewed·May 30, 2019
- Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search
Benchi Wang, Joram van Driel, … Jan Theeuwes·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2019
- Rapid inversion of singleton distractor representations underlies learned attentional suppression
Ziyao Zhang, Jarrod A. Lewis‐Peacock·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026