Individual Differences Elucidate the Perceptual Benefits Associated with Robust Temporal Fine-Structure Processing
Abstract
The auditory system is unique among sensory systems in its ability to phase lock to and precisely follow very fast cycle-by-cycle fluctuations in the phase of sound-driven cochlear vibrations. Yet, the perceptual role of this temporal fine structure (TFS) code is debated. This fundamental gap is attributable to our inability to experimentally manipulate TFS cues without altering other perceptually relevant cues. Here, we circumnavigated this limitation by leveraging individual differences across 200 participants to systematically compare variations in TFS sensitivity to performance in a range of speech perception tasks. TFS sensitivity was assessed through detection of interaural time/phase differences, while speech perception was evaluated by word identification under noise interference. Results suggest that greater TFS sensitivity is not associated with greater masking release from fundamental-frequency or spatial cues, but appears to contribute to resilience against the effects of reverberation. We also found that greater TFS sensitivity is associated with faster response times, indicating reduced listening effort. These findings highlight the perceptual significance of TFS coding for everyday hearing. Significance StatementNeural phase-locking to fast temporal fluctuations in sounds-temporal fine structure (TFS) in particular- is a unique mechanism by which acoustic information is encoded by the auditory system. However, despite decades of intensive research, the perceptual relevance of this metabolically expensive mechanism, especially in challenging listening settings, is debated. Here, we leveraged an individual-difference approach to circumnavigate the limitations plaguing conventional approaches and found that robust TFS sensitivity is associated with greater resilience against the effects of reverberation and is associated with reduced listening effort for speech understanding in noise.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Individualized Assays of Temporal Coding in the Ascending Human Auditory System
Agudemu Borjigin, Alexandra R. Hustedt-Mai, Hari Bharadwaj·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2022
- Echoes as Signal, Not Noise: Reverberation Sharpens Sensitivity to Temporal Structure
Peirun Song, Lingling Zhang, … Xiongjie Yu·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2025
- Speech Fine Structure Contains Critical Temporal Cues to Support Speech Segmentation
Xiangbin Teng, Gregory B. Cogan, David Poeppel·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- The rapid decline in interaural-time-difference sensitivity for pure tones can be explained by peripheral filtering
Matthew J. Goupell, G. Christopher Stecker, … Daniel J. Tollin·Journal of the Association for Research in OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2024
- Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble
Vibha Viswanathan, Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham, Michael G. Heinz·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2021
- Distinct timescales for the neuronal encoding of vocal signals in a high-order auditory area
Aurore Cazala, Catherine Del Negro, Nicolas Giret·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2021