The Effects of Speech Masking on Neural Tracking of Acoustic and Semantic Features of Natural Speech
Sonia Yasmin, Vanessa C. Irsik, Ingrid S. JohnsrudeiD, Björn HerrmanniD
Abstract
Listening environments contain background sounds that mask speech and lead to communication challenges. Sensitivity to slow acoustic fluctuations in speech can help segregate speech from background noise. Semantic context can also facilitate speech perception in noise, for example, by enabling prediction of upcoming words. However, not much is known about how different degrees of background masking affect the neural processing of acoustic and semantic features during naturalistic speech listening. In the current electroencephalography (EEG) study, participants listened to engaging, spoken stories masked at different levels of multi-talker babble to investigate how neural activity in response to acoustic and semantic features changes with acoustic challenges, and how such effects relate to speech intelligibility. The pattern of neural response amplitudes associated with both acoustic and semantic speech features across masking levels was U-shaped, such that amplitudes were largest for moderate masking levels. This U-shape may be due to increased attentional focus when speech comprehension is challenging, but manageable. The latency of the neural responses increased linearly with increasing background masking, and neural latency change associated with acoustic processing most closely mirrored the changes in speech intelligibility. Finally, tracking responses related to semantic dissimilarity remained robust until severe speech masking (-3 dB SNR). The current study reveals that neural responses to acoustic features are highly sensitive to background masking and decreasing speech intelligibility, whereas neural responses to semantic features are relatively robust, suggesting that individuals track the meaning of the story well even in moderate background sound.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 31
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural signatures of engagement and event segmentation during story listening in background noise
Björn Herrmann, Aysha Motala, … Ingrid S. Johnsrude·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Leading and Following: Noise Differently Affects Semantic and Acoustic Processing during Naturalistic Speech Comprehension
Xinmiao Zhang, Jiawei Li, … Dan Zhang·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 6, 2023
- Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions
Vibha Viswanathan, Hari Bharadwaj, … Michael G. Heinz·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2021
- Flexible neural encoding predicts the comprehension of degraded speech
Alexis Deighton MacIntyre, Tobias Goehring, Matthew H. Davis·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- Electrophysiological indices of hierarchical speech processing differentially reflect the comprehension of speech in noise
Shyanthony R. Synigal, Andrew James Anderson, Edmund C. Lalor·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2026
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope predicts binaural unmasking
Benjamin Dieudonné, Lien P. Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2024