Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Nonlinear manifolds underlie neural population activity during behaviour

Cátia FortunatoiD, Jorge Bennasar-Vázquez, Junchol ParkiD, Joanna C. ChangiD, Lee E. MilleriD, Joshua Tate DudmaniD, Matthew G. PerichiD, Juan Álvaro GallegoiD

Abstract

There is rich variety in the activity of single neurons recorded during behaviour. Yet, these diverse single neuron responses can be well described by relatively few patterns of neural co-modulation. The study of such low-dimensional structure of neural population activity has provided important insights into how the brain generates behaviour. Virtually all of these studies have used linear dimensionality reduction techniques to estimate these population-wide co-modulation patterns, constraining them to a flat "neural manifold". Here, we hypothesised that since neurons have nonlinear responses and make thousands of distributed and recurrent connections that likely amplify such nonlinearities, neural manifolds should be intrinsically nonlinear. Combining neural population recordings from monkey, mouse, and human motor cortex, and mouse striatum, we show that: 1) neural manifolds are intrinsically nonlinear; 2) their nonlinearity becomes more evident during complex tasks that require more varied activity patterns; and 3) manifold nonlinearity varies across architecturally distinct brain regions. Simulations using recurrent neural network models confirmed the proposed relationship between circuit connectivity and manifold nonlinearity, including the differences across architecturally distinct regions. Thus, neural manifolds underlying the generation of behaviour are inherently nonlinear, and properly accounting for such nonlinearities will be critical as neuroscientists move towards studying numerous brain regions involved in increasingly complex and naturalistic behaviours.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC 4.0

Across monkey, mouse and human motor cortex and mouse striatum, population activity is reported to occupy curved rather than flat low-dimensional spaces, most clearly in complex tasks.

Almost all work on low-dimensional population structure uses linear dimensionality reduction, which forces the estimated manifold to be flat, even though neurons respond nonlinearly and sit in recurrent circuits that can amplify those nonlinearities. If the underlying geometry is curved, methods that assume flatness will misdescribe activity as studies move to more regions and more naturalistic behaviour.

Key results

  1. ClaimedNeural manifolds are reported to be intrinsically nonlinear in recordings from four systems: monkey, mouse and human motor cortex and mouse striatum.

    Stated as the first of three findings; the abstract gives no measure of nonlinearity, no dimensionality estimates and no comparison against a linear fit. · Abstract

  2. ClaimedNonlinearity is more pronounced during complex tasks demanding more varied activity patterns, and differs between brain regions with different architecture.

    Reported as findings two and three; no task list, effect size or region-by-region numbers appear in the abstract. · Abstract

  3. SuggestedRecurrent neural network simulations reproduce the proposed link between circuit connectivity and manifold nonlinearity, including differences between architecturally distinct regions.

    Simulation evidence only, described as confirming the hypothesised relationship; no network parameters, metrics or statistics are reported. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Neural population recordings from several species and regions were examined for intrinsic nonlinearity of their low-dimensional manifolds, compared across tasks of differing complexity and across brain regions, alongside recurrent neural network simulations relating connectivity to manifold nonlinearity. The abstract does not say how nonlinearity was quantified.

  • neural population recordings from motor cortex · monkey
  • neural population recordings from motor cortex · mouse
  • neural population recordings from motor cortex · human
  • neural population recordings from striatum · mouse
  • simulated activity from recurrent neural network models of varying connectivity
Methods & tools
recurrent neural network models, linear dimensionality reduction
Reproducibility gaps
No repository, dataset location or data-sharing statement appears in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
  • Nonlinearity is asserted without any quantitative measure, baseline comparison or statistics in the available text, so neither its magnitude nor its practical consequence for existing analyses can be judged. · noted in this summary
  • The causal link between connectivity and manifold curvature rests on recurrent network simulations rather than on manipulations of the recorded circuits. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you fit low-dimensional models to neural population recordings and need to know whether assuming a flat manifold distorts the geometry.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMarschall '26Gallego '18Feulner '21Pezon '26De '23Altan '23
74% semantic matchNeuroscience
Owen Marschall, David G. Clark, Ashok Litwin-Kumar·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2026· 3 citations