Live soil ameliorated the negative effects of biodegradable but not non-biodegradable microplastics on the growth of plant communities
Abstract
O_LIPlastic pollution has become a global environmental problem. Alternative use of biodegradable plastics has been proposed to mitigate the pollution problem caused by the traditional non-biodegradable plastics but the relative impacts of both types of microplastics on plant community productivity and diversity remain unknown. Microplastics can affect growth of individual plants directly by altering plant physiological processes and indirectly by altering soil biota that in turn influence plant growth. However, it remains unknown whether soil biota can mediate impact of biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics on plant community productivity and diversity due to a lack of studies on the topic. C_LIO_LIHere, we performed a greenhouse experiment with six plant communities and five biodegradable and five non-biodegradable microplastics to test whether: 1) biodegradable microplastics have a less negative effect on plant community biomass production and diversity than non-biodegradable microplastics, and 2) soil microorganisms differentially mediate the effects of non-biodegradable and biodegradable microplastics on plant community biomass production and diversity. We employed a fully crossed factorial design to grow the six plant communities in the presence vs. absence of the 10 microplastics individually and in live soil vs. sterilized soil. C_LIO_LIResults show that live soil ameliorated the negative effects of biodegradable microplastics on shoot biomass of the plant communities, but microplastics suppressed plant community diversity more strongly in live soil than in sterilized soil regardless of microplastics types under averaged across all treatments. Furthermore, the specific microplastics polymers were the main drivers of these results. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Overall, our findings indicate that even biodegradable microplastics, e.g. PBS, which are considered environmentally friendly, still pose significant ecological risks to the structure and productivity of plant communities with potential implications for functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Future studies may identify the specific taxa of soil microorganisms that may have degraded the microplastics that we studied, their rates of biodegradation, and the effects thereof on plant community structure and productivity under more natural field conditions in contrasting climatic conditions. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Microplastic pollution induces algae blooms in experimental ponds but bioplastics are less harmful
Scott G. Morton, Gabriel Vucelic-Frick, … Jonathan B. Shurin·Communications SustainabilityPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2026
- Structural and Functional Responses of Soil Microbial Communities to Biodegradable Plastic Film Mulching in Two Agroecosystems
S. Bandopadhyay, H. Y. Sintim, J. M. DeBruyn·bioRxiv·May 26, 2019
- The more synthetic polymer types pollute the soil, the stronger the growth suppression of invasive alien and native plants
Y. Fu, M. van Kleunen, … Y. Liu·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2022
- Bioplastic biodegradability shapes microbial communities in a coastal brackish environment
Igor Stelmach Pessi, Eeva Eronen‐Rasimus, … Hermanni Kaartokallio·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Microplastic shape, concentration and polymer type affect soil properties and plant biomass
Y. M. Lozano, T. Lehnert, … M. C. Rillig·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2020
- Legacy effect of microplastics on plant-soil feedbacks
Y. M. Lozano, M. C. Rillig·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2022