Clinical testing panels for ALS: global distribution, consistency, and challenges
Allison Ann DilliottiD, Ahmad Al NasseriD, Marwa ElnagheebiD, Jennifer A. FifitaiD, Lyndal HendeniD, Ingrid M. KeseleriD, Steven Lenz, Heather MarriottiD, Emily P. McCanniD, Maysen MesarosiD, Sarah Opie-MartiniD, Emma Owens, Brooke Palus, Justyne E. RossiD, Zhanjun WangiD, Hannah White, Ammar Al‐ChalabiiD, Peter Munch AnderseniD, Michael G BenatariD, Ian P. BlairiD, Johnathan Cooper‐KnockiD, Elizabeth A. Harrington, Jeannine M. HeckmanniD, John E. LandersiD, Cristiane Araújo Martins MorenoiD, , On behalf of the Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel
Abstract
ObjectiveIn 2021, the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) spectrum disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel (GCEP) was established to evaluate the strength of evidence for genes previously reported to be associated with ALS. Through this endeavor, we will provide standardized guidance to laboratories on which genes should be included in clinical genetic testing panels for ALS. In this manuscript, we aimed to assess the heterogeneity in the current global landscape of clinical genetic testing for ALS. MethodsWe reviewed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genetic Testing Registry (GTR) and members of the ALS GCEP to source frequently used testing panels and compare the genes included on the tests. Results14 clinical panels specific to ALS from 14 laboratories covered 4 to 54 genes. All panels report on ANG, SOD1, TARDBP, and VAPB; 50% included or offered the option of including C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) analysis. Of the 91 genes included in at least one of the panels, 40 (44.0%) were included on only a single panel. We could not find a direct link to ALS in the literature for 14 (15.4%) included genes. ConclusionsThe variability across the surveyed clinical genetic panels is concerning due to the possibility of reduced diagnostic yields in clinical practice and risk of a missed diagnoses for patients. Our results highlight the necessity for consensus regarding the appropriateness of gene inclusions in clinical genetic ALS tests to improve its application for patients living with ALS and their families.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The oligogenic structure of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has genetic testing, counselling, and therapeutic implications
Alfredo Iacoangeli, Allison Ann Dilliott, … Sali M.K. Farhan·Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2025
- Evaluating the utility of REVEL and CADD for interpreting variants in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes
Michael R. Fiorini, Allison Ann Dilliott, Sali M.K. Farhan·Human MutationPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2023
- How the prospect of a clinical trial impacts decision-making for predictive genetic testing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Myriam Fontaine, Kayla Horowitz, … Kristiana Salmon·medRxiv·Sep 30, 2024
- Partitioning the genetic architecture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Iris Broce, Chun Chieh Fan, … Rahul S. Desikan·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2019
- A Framework For Large-Scale Reconstruction Of Extended Pedigrees To Facilitate Gene Discovery In ALS
Daphne van Oosten, Paul Beele, … Wouter van Rheenen·medRxiv·Oct 5, 2026
- Towards a diagnostic test for sporadic ALS utilising deep learning and SNP microarrays
Jiajing Hu, Oliver Pain, … Alfredo Iacoangeli·medRxiv·Apr 12, 2025