Sign in
GenomicsJournal of Phycology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Phylotranscriptomics Reveals the Reticulate Evolutionary History of a Widespread Diatom Species Complex

Ozan ÇiftçiiD, Andrew James AlversoniD, Peter M. van BodegomiD, Wade R. RobertsiD, Adrienne MertensiD, Bart Van de VijveriD, Rosa TrobajoiD, David G. ManniD, Walter PirovanoiD, Iris van EijkiD, Barbara GravendeeliD

Abstract

In contrast to surveys based on a few genes that often provide limited taxonomic resolution, transcriptomes provide a wealth of genomic loci that can resolve relationships among taxonomically challenging lineages. Diatoms are a diverse group of aquatic microalgae that includes important bioindicator species and many such lineages. One example is Nitzschia palea, a widespread species complex with several morphologically based taxonomic varieties, some of which are critical pollution indicators. Morphological differences among the varieties are subtle and phylogenetic studies on a few genes fail to resolve their evolutionary relationships. We conducted morphometric and transcriptome analyses of 10 Nitzschia palea strains to resolve the relationships among strains and taxonomic varieties. Nitzschia palea was resolved into three clades, one of which corresponds to a group of strains with narrow linear-lanceolate valves. The other morphological group recovered in the shape outline analysis was not monophyletic and consisted of two clades. Subsequent gene-tree concordance analyses and phylogenetic network estimations revealed patterns of incomplete lineage sorting and gene flow between intraspecific lineages. We detected reticulated evolutionary patterns among lineages with different morphologies and a resulting putative recent hybrid. Our study shows that phylogenomic analyses of many unlinked nuclear loci, complemented with morphometrics, can resolve complex evolutionary histories of recently diverged species complexes.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
15
FWCI
1.06
Field percentile
top 26%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.