On the generalizability of diffusion MRI signal representations across acquisition parameters, sequences and tissue types: chronicles of the MEMENTO challenge.
Alberto De LucaiD, Andrada IanușiD, Alexander LeemansiD, Marco PalomboiD, Noam ShemeshiD, Hui Gary ZhangiD, Daniel C. AlexanderiD, Markus NilssoniD, Martijn FroelingiD, Geert Jan BiesselsiD, Mauro ZucchelliiD, Matteo FrigoiD, Enes AlbayiD, Sara SedlariD, Abib AlimiiD, Samuel Deslauriers‐GauthieriD, Rachid Deriche BiD, Rutger Fick, Maryam AfzaliiD, Tomasz PieciakiD, Fabian BogusziD, Santiago Aja‐FernándeziD, Evren ÖzarslaniD, Derek Kenton JonesiD, Haoze CheniD, , Kurt G. SchillingiD
Abstract
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an invaluable tool to assess the microstructural organization of brain tissue. Depending on the specific acquisition settings, the dMRI signal encodes specific properties of the underlying diffusion process. In the last two decades, several signal representations have been proposed to fit the dMRI signal and decode such properties. Most methods, however, are tested and developed on a limited amount of data, and their applicability to other acquisition schemes remains unknown. With this work, we aimed to shed light on the generalizability of existing dMRI signal representations to different diffusion encoding parameters and brain tissue types. To this end, we organized a community challenge - named MEMENTO, making available the same datasets for fair comparisons across algorithms and techniques. We considered two state-of-the-art diffusion datasets, including single-diffusion-encoding (SDE) spin-echo data from a human brain with over 3820 unique diffusion weightings (the MASSIVE dataset), and double (oscillating) diffusion encoding data (DDE/DODE) of a mouse brain including over 2520 unique data points. A subset of the data sampled in 5 different voxels was openly distributed, and the challenge participants were asked to predict the remaining part of the data. After one year, eight participant teams submitted a total of 80 signal fits. For each submission, we evaluated the mean squared error, the variance of the prediction error and the Bayesian information criteria. Most predictions predicted either multi-shell SDE data (37%) or DODE data (22%), followed by cartesian SDE data (19%) and DDE (18%). Most submissions predicted the signals measured with SDE remarkably well, with the exception of low and very strong diffusion weightings. The prediction of DDE and DODE data seemed more challenging, likely because none of the submissions explicitly accounted for diffusion time and frequency. Next to the choice of the model, decisions on fit procedure and hyperparameters play a major role in the prediction performance, highlighting the importance of optimizing and reporting such choices. This work is a community effort to highlight strength and limitations of the field at representing dMRI acquired with trending encoding schemes, gaining insights into how different models generalize to different tissue types and fiber configurations over a large range of diffusion encodings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Increased Sensitivity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Diffusion-Weighted MRI using Multi-Echo Acquisitions
Cornelius Eichner, Michael Paquette, … Alfred Anwander·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2020
- Linking microscopy to diffusion MRI with degenerate biophysical models: an application of the Bayesian EstimatioN of CHange (BENCH) framework
Daniel Kor, Hossein Rafipoor, … Amy F.D. Howard·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Denoising Diffusion MRI: Considerations and implications for analysis
J.P Manzano-Patron, Steen Moeller, … Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2023
- Spatial Image Gradient Estimation from the Diffusion MRI Profile
Iman Aganj, Thorsten Feiweier, … Andre J. W. van der Kouwe·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Investigating tissue microstructure using steady-state diffusion MRI
Benjamin C. Tendler·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2025
- Towards an informed choice of diffusion MRI image contrasts for cerebellar segmentation
Jon Haitz Legarreta, Lan Zhou, … Lauren J. O’Donnell·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025