bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Forecasting next-year change in antimicrobial resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii from genomic surveillance data
Tolulope Samuel AdeyinaiD, Damani Andre, Ali Aslam, Kenneth Onyedibe, Muhammed Idris
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Background: Surveillance tells laboratories which antimicrobial resistance genes are circulating now, but not which will change next. We built a model that forecasts, for each resistance gene and year, whether the following year brings a previously unseen allele (sequence variant), called emergence, or a change in the most common allele, called turnover. We tested it separately in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii. Results: We used genomes annotated with AMRFinderPlus: 2,385 gene-years across 331 genes for K.pneumoniae and 1,059 across 216 for A. baumannii. To remove the effect of sequencing effort, each gene-year was sampled to 10 records and the analysis repeated 25 times. Models were trained on earlier years and tested on later ones, and on genes held out of training. On later years every model ranked genes by risk better than simple baselines in both organisms, and results for held-out genes were close. In K.pneumoniae, turnover was predicted better than emergence (best area under the ROC curve, AUROC, 0.909 versus 0.819). In A. baumannii the order reversed (emergence 0.789, turnover 0.722). The two events also relied on different features. Emergence depended mainly on how many alleles a gene had already accumulated, in both organisms. Turnover in K. pneumoniae depended mainly on how dominant the leading allele already was, and a stability index added a small gain. In A. baumannii it was spread across many weaker features. There, 56% of changes in the leading allele involved only alleles already seen, against 23% in K. pneumoniae, which may make them harder to predict. Conclusions: Changes in resistance genes can be forecast a year ahead from routine genomic surveillance data, including for genes the model has not seen. How well it works, and what it depends on, differs between organisms, so models should be built and validated for each organism, not assumed to transfer. Such models could help laboratories decide which resistance genes to monitor most closely. Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; genomic surveillance; forecasting; machine learning; allele dynamics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Acinetobacter baumannii
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae using machine learning
Jordi Sevilla, Fernando Gónzález‐Candelas, Neris García‐González·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2024
- Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance Using Conserved Genes
Marcus Nguyen, Robert Olson, … James J. Davis·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2020
- ARGfore: A multivariate framework for forecasting antibiotic resistance gene abundances using time-series metagenomic datasets
Joung Min Choi, Monjura Afrin Rumi, … L. Zhang·IEEE AccessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- A natural history of AMR in Klebsiella pneumoniae: Global diversity, predictors, and predictions of evolutionary pathways
Olav N. L. Aga, Sabrina John Moyo, … Iain G. Johnston·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2025
- Risk Based Prediction of Novel AMR Variants Using Protein Language Models
Jennifer J Wood, Stephanie Portelli, … Nicholas Furnham·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2025
- Rapid Genomic Characterization and Global Surveillance of Klebsiella Using Pathogenwatch
Silvia Argimón, Sophia David, … John M. Stelling·Clinical Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2021