PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance Using Conserved Genes
Marcus NguyeniD, Robert OlsoniD, Maulik P. ShuklaiD, Margo VanOeffeleniD, James J. DavisiD
- Citations
- 58
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Abstract
A growing number of studies have shown that machine learning algorithms can be used to accurately predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes from bacterial sequence data. In these studies, models are typically trained using input features derived from comprehensive sets of known AMR genes or whole genome sequences. However, it can be difficult to determine whether genomes and their corresponding sets of AMR genes are complete when sequencing contaminated or metagenomic samples. In this study, we explore the possibility of using incomplete genome sequence data to predict AMR phenotypes. Machine learning models were built from randomly-selected sets of core genes that are held in common among the members of a species, and the AMR-conferring genes were removed based on their protein annotations. For Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus, we report that it is possible to classify susceptible and resistant phenotypes with average F1 scores ranging from 0.80-0.89 with as few as 100 conserved non-AMR genes, with very major error rates ranging from 0.11-0.23 and major error rates ranging from 0.10-0.20. Models built from core genes have predictive power in the cases where the primary AMR mechanism results from SNPs or horizontal gene transfer. By randomly sampling non-overlapping sets of core genes for use in these models, we show that F1 scores and error rates are stable and have little variance between replicates. Potential biases from strain-specific SNPs, phylogenetic sampling, and imbalances in the phylogenetic distribution of susceptible and resistant strains do not appear to have an impact on this result. Although these small core gene models have lower accuracies and higher error rates than models built from the corresponding assembled genomes, the results suggest that sufficient variation exists in the core non-AMR genes of a species for predicting AMR phenotypes. Overall this study suggests that building models from conserved genes may be a potentially useful strategy for predicting AMR phenotypes when genomes are incomplete.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- organism: rat
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing computational predictions of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes from microbial genomes
Kaixin Hu, Fernando Meyer, … Alice Carolyn McHardy·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2024
- Improved prediction of antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae using machine learning
Jordi Sevilla, Fernando Gónzález‐Candelas, Neris García‐González·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2024
- Minimal machine learning models of resistance identify novel antibiotic resistance discovery opportunities in Klebsiella pneumoniae
Kristina Kordova, Caitlin Collins, Julian Parkhill·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2025
- Biased sampling confounds machine learning prediction of antimicrobial resistance
Yanying Yu, Nicole E. Wheeler, Lars Barquist·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2025
- From sequence to signature: Machine learning uncovers multiscale feature landscapes that predict AMR across ESKAPE pathogens
Abhirupa Ghosh, Evan Pierce Brenner, … Janani Ravi·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2025
- A systematic analysis of machine learning pipelines for robust antimicrobial resistance prediction
Alex Aselstyne, Enamundram Naga Karthik, … Sarath Chandar·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026