bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Quality-control Normalization of Fluorescence Microscopy Morphometry and Colocalization Measurements for Improved Accuracy and Cross-instrument Reproducibility
John Oreopoulos, Glyn NelsoniD, Matthew J. Gastinger, Christopher L. MorrisoniD, Sabine Thomas, Michael A. KiebleriD, Aidan Boyce, Bernhard GoetzeiD
Abstract
Quantitative fluorescence microscopy is more reproducible when instrument performance is measured and incorporated into the analysis. We show that routinely monitored quality-control (QC) metrics like the system resolution and inter-channel co-registration are determinant variables that can be used to normalize common image readouts and thereby separate instrument-induced variation from genuine biological changes. For intra-channel morphometry, a Gaussian approximation of the fluorescence imaging process yields analytical factors that predict how geometric measurements (length, separation distance, area, volume, etc.) inflate and scale with resolution blur due to optical misalignments or natural optical quality variations. We validate this behavior by deliberately perturbing the system resolution and by exploiting the natural resolution differences in three nominally equivalent objective lenses configured to image the exact same synapses in cultured hippocampal neurons, where structural differences subtle by eye nonetheless produced statistically significant shifts in measured synaptic puncta volumes. For dual-channel colocalization (overlap) measurements, we normalize the inter-channel co-registration QC metric by the measured point-spread function (PSF) resolutions (rather than theoretical limits associated with the objective lens) and demonstrate how fluorescent pre/postsynaptic cleft protein overlap signals decay in a predictable, exponential fashion as the PSF-normalized registration error increases, with the decay rate depending on the imaged object relative to the PSF size ratio. Mapped field-of-view gradients in channel registration also explain feature orientation flips/rotations and overlap loss without any underlying biological change. Finally, we outline a simple QC-aware microscope normalization workflow where each image measurement dataset is paired with its session PSFs and local co-registration error to remove instrument bias and optionally re-project the results to a declared reference PSF without altering the raw images. This approach improves image measurement accuracy and cross-instrument comparability of experiments and reframes light microscope QC from a passive certification of instrument health into a practical normalization that links the acquisition state to quantitative outcomes, thus ensuring the reliability and interpretability of morphometric and colocalization data in fluorescence microscopy.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Long-term quality assessment and monitoring of light microscope performance through accessible and reliable protocols, tools and metrics
O. Faklaris, L. Bancel-Vallee, … T. Guilbert·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2021
- How to quantitatively measure, assess and correct the fluorescence crosstalk in the wide-field microscopy
- Image quality metrics fail to accurately represent biological information in fluorescence microscopy
Ihuan Gunawan, Richard J. Marsh, … Siân Culley·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2025
- Monitoring microscope performance in an imaging facility using OMERO-metrics.
Sophia Sommer, Oumou Dhmine, … Ian M. Dobbie·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- Tissue-Like 3D Standard and Protocols for Microscope Quality Management
B. Abrams, T. Pengo, … C. M. Brown·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2022
- Localization accuracy in single-molecule fluorescence microscopy
Katarina B. Chapman, Roman Schmidt, … Stefan W. Hell·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026