Nature MicrobiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Processing-bias correction with DEBIAS-M improves cross-study generalization of microbiome-based prediction models
George I. AustiniD, Aya Brown KaviD, Shahd ElNaggariD, Heekuk ParkiD, Jana BiermanniD, Anne‐Catrin UhlemanniD, Itsik Pe’eriD, Tal KoremiD
Abstract
Every step in common microbiome profiling protocols has variable efficiency for each microbe. For example, different DNA extraction kits may have different efficiency for Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. These variable efficiencies, combined with technical variation, create strong processing biases, which impede the identification of signals that are reproducible across studies and the development of generalizable and biologically interpretable prediction models. "Batch-correction" methods have been used to alleviate these issues computationally with some success. However, many make strong parametric assumptions which do not necessarily apply to microbiome data or processing biases, or require the use of an outcome variable, which risks overfitting. Lastly and importantly, existing transformations used to correct microbiome data are largely non-interpretable, and could, for example, introduce values to features that were initially mostly zeros. Altogether, processing bias currently compromises our ability to glean robust and generalizable biological insights from microbiome data. Here, we present DEBIAS-M (Domain adaptation with phenotype Estimation and Batch Integration Across Studies of the Microbiome), an interpretable framework for inference and correction of processing bias, which facilitates domain adaptation in microbiome studies. DEBIAS-M learns bias-correction factors for each microbe in each batch that simultaneously minimize batch effects and maximize cross-study associations with phenotypes. Using benchmarks of HIV and colorectal cancer classification from gut microbiome data, and cervical neoplasia prediction from cervical microbiome data, we demonstrate that DEBIAS-M outperforms batch-correction methods commonly used in the field. Notably, we show that the inferred bias-correction factors are stable, interpretable, and strongly associated with specific experimental protocols. Overall, we show that DEBIAS-M allows for better modeling of microbiome data and identification of interpretable signals that are reproducible across studies.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A multivariate method to correct for batch effects in microbiome data
Yiwen Wang, Kim‐Anh Lê Cao·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- Correcting for batch effects in case-control microbiome studies
Sean M. Gibbons, Claire Duvallet, Eric J. Alm·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2018
- Uncertainty Modeling Outperforms Machine Learning for Microbiome Data Analysis
Maxwell A. Konnaris, Manan Saxena, … Justin D. Silverman·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2025
- Correcting for Background Noise Improves Phenotype Prediction from Human Gut Microbiome Data
Leah Briscoe, Brunilda Balliu, … Nandita R. Garud·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- MOSAIC: A Pipeline for MicrobiOme Studies Analytical Integration and Correction
Chenlian Fu, Jiuyao Lu, … Wodan Ling·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2024
- Measuring and Mitigating PCR Bias in Microbiome Data
Justin D. Silverman, Rachael J. Bloom, … Lawrence A. David·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2019