Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Decoding the contents of consciousness from prefrontal ensembles

Vishal KapooriD, Abhilash DwarakanathiD, Shervin SafaviiD, Joachim Werner, Michel BesserveiD, Theofanis I. PanagiotaropoulosiD, Nikos K. LogothetisiD

Abstract

Multiple theories attribute to the primate prefrontal cortex a critical role in conscious perception. However, opposing views caution that prefrontal activity could reflect other cognitive variables during paradigms investigating consciousness, such as decision-making, monitoring and motor reports. To resolve this ongoing debate, we recorded from prefrontal ensembles of macaque monkeys during a no-report paradigm of binocular rivalry that instigates internally driven transitions in conscious perception. We could decode the contents of consciousness from prefrontal ensemble activity during binocular rivalry with an accuracy similar to when these stimuli were presented without competition. Oculomotor signals, used to infer conscious content, were not the only source of these representations since visual input could be significantly decoded when eye movements were suppressed. Our results suggest that the collective dynamics of prefrontal cortex populations reflect internally generated changes in the content of consciousness during multistable perception. One sentence summaryNeural correlates of conscious perception can be detected and perceptual contents can be reliably decoded from the spiking activity of prefrontal populations.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract

Prefrontal ensemble spiking in macaques during no-report binocular rivalry carries the currently perceived stimulus, decoded about as accurately as when the same stimuli were shown without competition.

It is disputed whether prefrontal activity during consciousness experiments reflects perceptual content itself or the decision, monitoring and motor report that usually come with it. A no-report rivalry paradigm, where perceptual switches are internally driven and content is inferred without a behavioural report, separates those possibilities.

Key results

  1. SuggestedThe content of perception during binocular rivalry could be decoded from prefrontal ensemble activity, with accuracy similar to decoding the same stimuli presented without competition.

    Reported as comparable decoding between the rivalry and no-competition conditions; the abstract gives no accuracy values, chance level, ensemble size, number of sessions or number of animals. · Abstract

  2. SuggestedThe decoded representation was not purely oculomotor: visual input could still be decoded significantly when eye movements were suppressed, even though oculomotor signals were what the paradigm used to infer perceptual content.

    Stated as significant decoding under eye-movement suppression; no test statistic, p-value or accuracy is given in the abstract. · Abstract

  3. ClaimedThe authors read these results as prefrontal population dynamics tracking internally generated changes of perceptual content during multistable perception.

    An interpretive conclusion drawn from the decoding results; no causal manipulation of prefrontal cortex and no timing analysis relative to perceptual switches is described in the abstract. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Ensemble recordings from prefrontal cortex of macaque monkeys during a no-report binocular rivalry paradigm, in which perceptual transitions arise internally and the perceived stimulus is inferred from oculomotor signals rather than a report. Decoding was compared against stimuli presented without competition, and also run with eye movements suppressed.

  • prefrontal ensemble spiking recorded during no-report binocular rivalry, during stimuli presented without competition, and with eye movements suppressed · macaque monkey
Methods & tools
no-report binocular rivalry paradigm
Limitations (2)
  • No decoding accuracies, chance levels, ensemble sizes or animal numbers appear in the abstract, so the similarity between rivalry and no-competition decoding cannot be weighed, and similar accuracy is not by itself evidence of equivalence. · noted in this summary
  • Decoding establishes that information about the perceived stimulus is present in prefrontal populations, not that prefrontal cortex generates the percept; no causal manipulation is reported. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you study neural correlates of consciousness or population decoding and want prefrontal evidence collected without a behavioural report.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.