Sign in
GeneticsbioRxiv
Preprint

LDpred-funct: incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets

Carla Márquez‐LunaiD, Steven GazaliD, Po‐Ru LohiD, Samuel Sungil KimiD, Nicholas A. FurlotteiD, Adam AutoniD, Alkes L. PriceiD

Abstract

Genetic variants in functional regions of the genome are enriched for complex trait heritability. Here, we introduce a new method for polygenic prediction, LDpred-funct, that leverages trait-specific functional priors to increase prediction accuracy. We fit priors using the recently developed baseline-LD model, which includes coding, conserved, regulatory and LD-related annotations. We analytically estimate posterior mean causal effect sizes and then use cross-validation to regularize these estimates, improving prediction accuracy for sparse architectures. LDpred-funct attained higher prediction accuracy than other polygenic prediction methods in simulations using real genotypes. We applied LDpred-funct to predict 21 highly heritable traits in the UK Biobank. We used association statistics from British-ancestry samples as training data (avg N=373K) and samples of other European ancestries as validation data (avg N=22K), to minimize confounding. LDpred-funct attained a +4.6% relative improvement in average prediction accuracy (avg prediction R2=0.144; highest R2=0.413 for height) compared to SBayesR (the best method that does not incorporate functional information). For height, meta-analyzing training data from UK Biobank and 23andMe cohorts (total N=1107K; higher heritability in UK Biobank cohort) increased prediction R2 to 0.431. Our results show that incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy, consistent with the functional architecture of complex traits.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

LDpred-funct adds baseline-LD functional priors to polygenic scores: average prediction R2 0.144 across 21 UK Biobank traits, a 4.6% relative gain over SBayesR.

Heritability of complex traits is enriched in functional regions of the genome, yet SBayesR, the strongest comparator here, uses no functional information. Fitting trait-specific functional priors from the baseline-LD model and then regularising the effect-size estimates by cross-validation is offered as a way to turn that enrichment into prediction accuracy.

Key results

  1. ShownOn 21 highly heritable UK Biobank traits, LDpred-funct predicted more accurately than SBayesR, the strongest comparator that ignores functional annotations.

    Average prediction R2 = 0.144, a +4.6% relative improvement over SBayesR, with the highest R2 of 0.413 for height. Training used British-ancestry association statistics (avg N=373K) and validation used other European-ancestry samples (avg N=22K) to limit confounding. · Abstract

  2. ShownFor height, enlarging the training data by meta-analysing UK Biobank with 23andMe pushed accuracy higher still.

    Height prediction R2 = 0.431 from combined training data (total N=1107K), against R2 = 0.413 with UK Biobank training alone; the authors note heritability was higher in the UK Biobank cohort. · Abstract

  3. SuggestedIn simulations built on real genotypes, LDpred-funct was reported to beat the other polygenic prediction methods tested.

    No accuracy values, competing methods or simulation settings (architecture, heritability, sample size) are given for the simulation comparison in the abstract. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

A polygenic prediction method that fits trait-specific functional priors using the baseline-LD model, whose annotations cover coding, conserved and regulatory regions plus LD-related features, estimates posterior mean causal effect sizes analytically, and then regularises those estimates by cross-validation to improve accuracy when the genetic architecture is sparse.

  • UK Biobank association statistics from British-ancestry samples, used as training data for 21 highly heritable traits · human · n = avg N=373K
  • UK Biobank samples of other European ancestries, used as validation data · human · n = avg N=22K
  • meta-analysed UK Biobank and 23andMe training data for height · human · n = total N=1107K
  • simulations using real genotypes · human
Methods & tools
LDpred-funct, baseline-LD model, SBayesR, UK Biobank, 23andMe
Limitations (2)
  • Training and validation samples are both of European ancestry, by design to limit confounding, so the reported accuracies say nothing about how the scores transfer to other ancestries. · noted in this summary
  • The 4.6% gain is a relative average over 21 traits against a single comparator; per-trait improvements, their variability, and comparisons with other functionally informed prediction methods are not reported in the abstract. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you build polygenic scores and want to know how much functional-annotation priors buy over SBayesR on well-powered biobank traits.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZheng '24Zhang '21Lloyd‐Jones '19Weissbrod '20Weissbrod '22Privé '20
74% semantic matchGenetics
Zhili Zheng, Shouye Liu, Julia Sidorenko+23 more·Nature Genetics·Apr 30, 2024· 222 citations