Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores
Vorthunju NakhonsriiD, Manop PithukpakorniD, Jakris Eu‐ahsunthornwattanaiD, Chumpol NgamphiwiD, Rujipat WasitthankasemiD, Alisa Wilantho, Pongsakorn WangkumhangiD, Manon BoonbangyangiD, Sissades TongsimaiD
Abstract
Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) are now playing an important role in predicting overall risk of breast cancer risk by means of adding contribution factors across independent genetic variants influencing the disease. However, PRS models may work better in some ethnic populations compared to others, thus requiring populaion-specific validation. This study evaluates the performance of 140 previously published PRS models in a Thai population, an underrepresented ethnic group. To rigorously evaluate the performance of 140 breast PRS models, we employed generalized linear models (GLM) combined with a robust evaluation strategy, including Five-fold cross validation and bootstrap analysis in which each model was tested across 1,000 bootstrap iterations to ensure the robustness of our findings and to identify models with consistently strong predictive ability. Among the 140 models evaluated, 38 demonstrated robust predictive ability, identified through > 163 bootstrap iterations (95% CI: 163.88). PGS004688 exhibited the highest performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.5930 (95% CI: 0.5903-0.5957) and a McFaddens pseudo R2 of 0.0146 (95% CI: 0.0139-0.0153). Women in the 90th percentile of PRS had a 1.83-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to those within the 30th to 70th percentiles (95% CI: 1.04-3.18). This study highlights the importance of local validation for PRS models derived from diverse populations, demonstrating their potential for personalized breast cancer risk assessment. Model PGS004688, with its robust performance and significant risk stratification, warrants further investigation for clinical implementation in breast cancer screening and prevention strategies. Our findings emphasize the need for adapting and utilizing PRS in diverse populations to provide more accessible public health solutions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer in Korean women
Yon Ho Jee, Weang-Kee Ho, … Peter Kraft·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2022
- Precision Breast Cancer Screening with a Polygenic Risk Score
Tõnis Tasa, Mikk Puustusmaa, … Peeter Padrik·medRxiv·Aug 17, 2020
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer Risk in Women of African Ancestry: a Cross-Ancestry Approach
Guimin Gao, Fangyuan Zhao, … Dezheng Huo·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2022
- Assessing the risk stratification of breast cancer polygenic risk scores in two Brazilian samples
Rodrigo Barreiro, Tatiana Ferreira de Almeida, … Michel Satya Naslavsky·medRxiv·Sep 9, 2022
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study
Peh Joo Ho, Iain Beehuat Tan, … Jingmei Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2023
- A Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation in 15,490 Brazilians using Exome Sequencing
Flávia E. Rius, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini, … David Schlesinger·DiagnosticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2025