Sign in
NeuroscienceLecture notes in computer science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Evaluating 35 Methods to Generate Structural Connectomes Using Pairwise Classification

Dmitry PetroviD, Alexander Ivanov, Joshua FaskowitziD, Boris A. GutmaniD, Daniel MoyeriD, Julio E. Villalon, Neda JahanshadiD, Paul M. ThompsoniD

Abstract

There is no consensus on how to construct structural brain networks from diffusion MRI. How variations in pre-processing steps affect network reliability and its ability to distinguish subjects remains opaque. In this work, we address this issue by comparing 35 structural connectome-building pipelines. We vary diffusion reconstruction models, tractography algorithms and parcellations. Next, we classify structural connectome pairs as either belonging to the same individual or not. Connectome weights and eight topological derivative measures form our feature set. For experiments, we use three test-retest datasets from the Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) comprised of a total of 105 individuals. We also compare pairwise classification results to a commonly used parametric test-retest measure, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC){ddagger}.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
12
FWCI
4.92
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISOldham '20Messaritaki '19Sebenius '22Li '21Finger '16Osmanlıoğlu '20
68% semantic matchNeuroscience
Stuart Oldham, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Robert Elton Smith+3 more·NeuroImage·Aug 13, 2020· 64 citations