A novel method for harmonization of PET image spatial resolution without phantoms
Félix CarbonelliD, Alex P. Zijdenbos, Evan Hempel, Mihály HajósiD, Barry J. Bedell, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Abstract
The most common approach for estimating the spatial resolution of PET images in multi-center studies typically uses Hoffman phantom data as a surrogate. Specifically, the phantom-based matching resolution approach assumes that scanned phantom PET images are well approximated by a ground truth, noise-free digital phantom convolved with a Gaussian kernel of unknown size. The size of the kernel is then estimated by an exhaustive search on the amount of blurring needed to match the smoothed digital phantom to a particular scanned phantom image. Unfortunately, Hoffman phantom images may not always be readily available, and phantom-based approaches may yield sub-optimal results. We propose a new, computational approach that allows estimation of spatial resolution directly from the PET image itself. We generalized the so-called logarithmic intensity plots method to the 3D case to perform a spatial resolution estimation in both axial and in-plane directions of the PET images. The proposed approach was applied to two different cohorts. The first cohort consisted of [18F]florbetapir amyloid PET images and matching phantoms coming from a Phase II clinical trial and includes different scanner models and/or orientation and grid reconstructions. The second cohort included {beta}-amyloid, FDG and tau PET images from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. We obtained in-plane and axial resolution estimators that vary between 3.5 mm and 8.5 mm for both PET and matching phantom images. In both cases, we obtained small across-subject variability in groups of images sharing the same PET scanner model and reconstruction parameters. For human PET images, we also obtained a strong cross-tracer and longitudinal consistency in the spatial resolution estimators. Our novel approach does not only eliminate the need for surrogate brain phantom data, but also provides a general framework that can be applied to a wide range of tracers and other image modalities, such as SPECT.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Field percentile
- top 28%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Computational approaches for parametric imaging of dynamic PET data
S. Crisci, M. Piana, … M. Scussolini·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- Parametric Imaging Of FDG-PET Data Using Physiology And Iterative Regularization: Application To The Hepatic And Renal Systems
Mara Scussolini, Sara Garbarino, … Michele Piana·bioRxiv·May 11, 2017
- Biomarker Localization, Analysis, Visualization, Extraction, and Registration (BLAzER) Workflow for Research and Clinical Brain PET Applications
Fabio Raman, Sameera Grandhi, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Journal of Alzheimer s DiseasePeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2019
- Improved temporal resolution for mapping brain metabolism using functional PET and anatomical MRI knowledge
Viswanath Pamulakanty Sudarshan, Shenpeng Li, … Zhaolin Chen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2021
- Lost in Space: The Impact of Traditional Neuroimaging Methods on the Spatial Localization of Cortical Areas
Timothy S. Coalson, David C. Van Essen, Matthew F. Glasser·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2018
- BrainPET Studio: An Atlas-Based, User-Friendly Desktop Tool for Quantitative PET Neuroimaging Analysis
Fardin Nabizadeh·Neurology LettersPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026