Sign in
GenomicsSystematic Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Phylogenomic Insights into the Evolution and Origin of Nematoda

Xue QingiD, Yuanmeng Miles ZhangiD, Sidi Sun, Mohammed Ismail AhmediD, Wen‐Sui LoiD, Wim Bert, Oleksandr V. HolovachoviD, Hongmei LiiD

Abstract

The phylum Nematoda represents one of the most cosmopolitan and abundant metazoan groups on Earth. In this study, we reconstructed the phylogenomic tree for phylum Nematoda. A total of 60 genomes, belonging to eight nematode orders, were newly sequenced, providing the first low-coverage genomes for the orders Dorylaimida, Mononchida, Monhysterida, Chromadorida, Triplonchida, and Enoplida. The resulting phylogeny is well-resolved across most clades, with topologies remaining consistent across various reconstruction parameters. The subclass Enoplia is placed as a sister group to the rest of Nematoda, agrees with previous published phylogenies. While the order Triplonchida is monophyletic, it is not well-supported, and the order Enoplida is paraphyletic. Taxa possessing a stomatostylet form a monophyletic group; however, the superfamily Aphelenchoidea does not constitute a monophyletic clade. The genera Trichinella and Trichuris are inferred to have shared a common ancestor approximately 202 mya, a considerably later period than previously suggested. All stomatostylet-bearing nematodes are proposed to have originated [~]305 mya, corresponding to the transition from the Devonian to the Permian period. The genus Thornia is placed outside of Dorylaimina and Nygolaimina, disagreeing with its position in previous studies. Additionally, we tested the whole genome amplification method and demonstrated that it is a promising strategy for obtaining sufficient DNA for phylogenomic studies of microscopic eukaryotes. This study significantly expanded the current nematode genome dataset, and the well-resolved phylogeny enhances our understanding of the evolution of Nematoda.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLocke '18Zhang '24Xiang '26Zapata '14Cunha '19Cucini '26
64% semantic matchEvolutionary Biology
S. A. Locke, A. Van Dam, M. Caffara+3 more·bioRxiv·May 30, 2018