Perception of near-threshold visual stimuli is influenced by pre-stimulus alpha-band amplitude but not by alpha phase
María MelcóniD, Enrique SterniD, Dominique KesseliD, Lydia AranaiD, Claudia PochiD, Pablo CampoiD, Almudena CapillaiD
Abstract
Ongoing brain activity preceding visual stimulation has been suggested to shape conscious perception. The underlying mechanisms are still under debate, although alpha oscillations have been pointed out as the main explanatory candidate. According to the pulsed-inhibition framework, bouts of functional inhibition arise in each alpha cycle, allowing information to be processed in a pulsatile manner. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that perceptual outcome can be influenced by the specific phase of alpha oscillations prior to the stimulus onset, although empirical findings are controversial. In this study, we aimed to shed light on the role of pre-stimulus alpha oscillations in visual perception. To this end, we recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) activity while participants performed three near-threshold visual detection tasks with different attentional involvement: a no-cue task, a non-informative cue task (50% cue validity), and an informative cue task (100% cue validity). Cluster-based permutation statistics were complemented with Bayesian analyses to test the effect of pre-stimulus oscillatory amplitude and phase on visual awareness. We additionally examined whether these effects differed on trials with low and high oscillatory amplitude, as expected from the pulsed-inhibition theory. Our results show a clear effect of pre-stimulus alpha amplitude on conscious perception, but only when alpha fluctuated spontaneously and was not modulated by attention, supporting the notion that alpha-band power indexes neural excitability. In contrast, we did not find any evidence that pre-stimulus alpha phase influences the perceptual outcome, not even when differentiating between low and high amplitude trials. Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided moderate evidence in favor of the absence of phase effects. Taken together, our results challenge the central theoretical predictions of the pulsed-inhibition framework, at least for the particular experimental conditions used here.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Alpha phase-amplitude tradeoffs predict visual perception
Camille Fakche, Rufin Vanrullen A, … Laura Dugué·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- A joint alpha power-phase dynamic shapes visual sensitivity
Henry A. Beale, Jason B. Mattingley, Anthony M. Harris·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026
- Spontaneous alpha-band amplitude predicts subjective visibility but not discrimination accuracy during high-level perception
Jason Samaha, Joshua J. LaRocque, Bradley R. Postle·Consciousness and CognitionPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2022
- Reduced alpha amplitudes predict perceptual suppression
Eva Poland, Aishwarya Bhonsle, … Melanie Wilke·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2021
- Prestimulus alpha phase modulates visual temporal integration
Michelle Johannknecht, Alfons Schnitzler, Joachim Lange·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2024
- How prior knowledge prepares perception: Alpha-band oscillations carry perceptual expectations and influence early visual responses
Jason Samaha, Bastien Boutonnet, … Gary Lupyan·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2018