Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party?
Orsolya SzalárdyiD, Brigitta TóthiD, Dávid FarkasiD, Gábor OrosziD, István WinkleriD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIn the cocktail party situation, people with normal hearing usually follow a single speaker among multiple concurrent ones. However, there is no agreement in the literature as to whether the background is segregated into multiple streams/speakers. The current study varied the number of concurrent speech streams and investigated target detection and memory for the contents of a target stream as well as the processing of distractors. A male-spoken target stream was either presented alone (single-speech), together with one male-spoken (one-distractor), or a male- and a female-spoken distractor (two-distractor). Behavioral measures of target detection and content tracking performance as well as target- and distractor detection related ERPs were assessed. We found that the detection sensitivity and the target N2b amplitude decreased whereas the P3b amplitude increased from the single-speech to the concurrent speech streams conditions. Importantly, the behavioral distractor effect differed between the conditions with one- vs. two-distractor (distraction by the female speaker was lower than that of the male speaker in either condition) and the target N2b elicited in the presence of two distractors was significantly smaller than that elicited in the presence of one distractor. Further, the voltage in the N2b time window significantly differed between the one- and two-distractor conditions for the same (M2) speaker. These results show that speech processing was different in the presence of one vs. two distractors, and thus, the current data suggest that the two background speech streams were segregated from each other.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An ecological investigation of the capacity to follow simultaneous speech and preferential detection of ones' own name
Danna Pinto, Maya Kaufman, … Elana Zion Golumbic·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2022
- Never mind the repeat: How speech expectations reduce tracking at the cocktail party
Thaiz Sánchez‐Costa, Alejandra Carboni, Francisco Cervantes Constantino·CortexPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2025
- Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party"
Gavin M. Bidelman, Fallon Bernard, Kimberly Skubic·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2024
- Voice and linguistic features support early attentional filtering of irrelevant stimuli
Sahil Luthra, Eric Parker, … Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2026
- Speech prosody supports speaker selection and auditory stream segregation in a multi-talker situation
Petra Kovács, Brigitta Tóth, … István Winkler·Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Familiarity of Background Music Modulates the Cortical Tracking of Target Speech at the Cocktail Party
Jane A. Brown, Gavin M. Bidelman·Brain SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2022