Frontiers in PsychologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The social situation affects how we process feedback about our actions
Artur CzeszumskiiD, Benedikt EhingeriD, Basil WahniD, Peter König BiD
Abstract
Humans achieve their goals in joint action tasks either by cooperation or competition. In the present study, we investigated the neural processes underpinning error and monetary rewards processing in such cooperative and competitive situations. We used electroencephalography (EEG) and analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) triggered by feedback in both social situations. 26 dyads performed a joint four-alternative forced choice (4AFC) visual task either cooperatively or competitively. At the end of each trial, participants received performance feedback about their individual and joint errors and accompanying monetary rewards. Furthermore, the outcome, i.e. resulting positive, negative or neutral rewards, was dependent on the pay-off matrix, defining the social situation either as cooperative or competitive. We used linear mixed effects models to analyze the feedback-related-negativity (FRN) and used the Thresholdfree cluster enhancement (TFCE) method to explore activations of all electrodes and times. We found main effects of the outcome and social situation at mid-line frontal electrodes. The FRN was more negative for losses than wins in both social situations. However, the FRN amplitudes differed between social situations. Moreover, we compared monetary with neutral outcomes in both social situations. Our exploratory TFCE analysis revealed that processing of feedback differs between cooperative and competitive situations at right temporo-parietal electrodes where the cooperative situation elicited more positive amplitudes. Further, the differences induced by the social situations were stronger in participants with higher scores on a perspective taking test. In sum, our results replicate previous studies about the FRN and extend them by comparing neurophysiological responses to positive and negative outcomes in a task that simultaneously engages two participants in competitive and cooperative situations.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct Processing of Selection and Execution Errors in Neural Signatures of Outcome Monitoring
Faisal Mushtaq, Samuel D. McDougle, … Richard B. Ivry·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2022
- Behavioural and neural limits in competitive decision making: The roles of outcome, opponency and observation
Benjamin James Dyson, Ben Albert Steward, … Lewis Forder·Biological PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2019
- EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning
Dimitrios J. Palidis, Paul L. Gribble·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020
- Neurophysiological correlates of collective perceptual decision-making
Kristina Gabrielle Baumgart, Petr Byvshev, … Basil Wahn·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2019
- Dissociable after-effects of prosocial acts: Effort is costly for others but valued for self
Ya Zheng, Rumeng Tang·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 14, 2026
- Social observation influences the trajectory of performance monitoring across trials: evidence from single-trial estimates of the ERN and CRN
Yanbin Niu, Kianoosh Hosseini, … George Arthur Buzzell·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2025