Sign in
NeuroscienceBehavior Research Methods
Peer-reviewed journal article

The validated touch-video database

Sophie SmitiD, Anina N. RichiD

Abstract

Visually observing a touch quickly reveals who is being touched, how it might feel, and the broader social or emotional context, shaping our interpretation of such interactions. Investigating these dimensions is essential for understanding how tactile experiences are processed individually and how we empathise with observed sensations in others. Here, we expand available resources for studying visually perceived touch by providing a wide-ranging set of dynamic interactions that specifically focus on the sensory qualities of touch. The Validated Touch-Video Database (VTD) consists of a set of 90 videos depicting tactile interactions with a stationary left hand, viewed from a first-person perspective. In each video, a second hand makes contact either directly (e.g., with fingers or an open palm) or using an object (e.g., a soft brush or scissors), with variations across dimensions such as hedonic qualities, arousal, threat, touch type, and the object used. Validation by 350 participants (283 women, 66 men, 1 non-binary) involved categorising the videos as neutral, pleasant, unpleasant, or painful and rating arousal and threat levels. Our findings reveal high inter-subject agreement, with painful touch videos eliciting the highest arousal and threat ratings, while neutral touch videos served as a baseline. Exploratory analyses revealed women rated the videos as more threatening and painful than men, suggesting potential gender differences in the visual perception of negatively valenced touch stimuli. The VTD provides a comprehensive resource for researchers investigating the sensory and emotional dimensions of observed touch.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
6
FWCI
2.83
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSmit '25Smit '25Smit '26Masson '18Butti '23Sousa '25
76% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sophie Smit, Matthew J. Crossley, Regine Zopf+1 more·Scientific Reports·Sep 29, 2025· 9 citations