Natural enemies can mediate the impact of plant microbiota on insect-borne virus transmission
Lucas A. NelliD, Tory A. HendryiD, Andrew M. HeiniD, Megan A. GreischariD
Abstract
Individual hosts can be protected from disease vectors through their microbiota, but how those benefits scale up to the host population level is rarely obvious. Disease spread may be inhibited through reduced vector visitation or amplified as vectors redirect their attention to unprotected hosts. The outcome--suppression or escalation of disease outbreaks--is likely to be influenced by natural enemies that redistribute or suppress vector populations. The challenge of determining how these processes interact across scales is exemplified by pea aphids, major virus vectors in pea crops that are commonly managed using parasitoid wasps. Recent evidence suggests that epiphytic bacteria in the genus Pseudomonas can repel or kill pea aphids, yet whether Pseudomonas-mediated protection from aphids complements or undermines parasitoid-based vector control remains unknown. We developed a multi-scale mathematical model to investigate why Pseudomonas complements versus undermines biocontrol of aphid-vectored virus outbreaks. Because Pseudomonas-induced mortality leaves aphids patchily distributed, the effect of Pseudomonas on virus outbreaks depends most strongly on how well parasitoids track aphid densities: When parasitoids efficiently locate aphids, Pseudomonas inhibits virus outbreaks by reducing aphid densities. However, when parasitoids are less efficient, they often search unproductively for aphids on Pseudomonas-inhabited plants with few aphids, slowing parasitoid population growth. Reduced parasitism intensifies aphid crowding on Pseudomonas-free plants and boosts the production of winged aphids that accelerate viral spread. Counterintuitively, the more effective Pseudomonas is at killing aphids, the more strongly it generates spatial variability and promotes virus spread. Our results show how community context dictates whether individual microbiota protection slows or accelerates viral outbreaks at the population scale.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modelling interference between vectors of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses to identify effective control strategies
M. Zaffaroni, L. Rimbaud, … D. Bevacqua·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2021
- Insects as phyllosphere microbiome engineers: effects of aphids on a plant pathogen.
M. R. Smee, I. Real-Ramirez, T. A. Hendry·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2019
- Epidemiological and ecological consequences of virus manipulation of host and vector in plant virus transmission
N. J. Cunniffe, N. P. Taylor, … M. J. Jeger·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2021
- Phages indirectly maintain plant pathogen defense through regulation of the commensal microbiome
Reena Debray, Asa E. Conover, Britt Koskella·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Predators affect a plant virus through direct and trait-mediated indirect effects on vectors
B. W. Lee, R. E. Clark, … D. Crowder·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2021
- The Initial Detection of a Diversity of Viruses Associated with Ladybirds and Other Biocontrol Agents Prompts Interesting Ecological Insights
Gabriela Barreto Caldas-Garcia, Ícaro Santos Lopes, Eric Roberto Guimarães Rocha Aguiar·VirologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026