bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Population-specific drivers of reproductive phenology in a widespread large carnivore, the gray wolf
Lauren Mae HennellyiD, Shivam ShrotriyaiD, Shaheer KhaniD, Alireza MohammadiiD, Mohammad S. FarhadiniaiD, Luís LlanezaiD, Joseph K. BumpiD, Austin T. HomkesiD, Steve K. WindelsiD, Mohamma Zafarul Islam, Yadvendradev Vikramsinh JhalaiD, José Vicente López‐BaoiD, Gretchen H. RoffleriD, Mihir Godbole, Indrajeet Ghorpade, Pierre ComizzoliiD, Nucharin SongsaseniD, Håkan SandiD, Camilla WikenrosiD, Petter WabakkeniD, Barbara ZimmermanniD, Peter Mahoney, Daniel R. StahleriD, Erin E. StahleriD, Matthew Metz, , Bilal HabibiD
Abstract
Animals often rely on cues from the environment to time reproduction with optimal conditions. However, for most species, which environmental cues are used and how their use varies across a species distribution remains poorly understood. The gray wolf (Canis lupus) is found across a broad latitudinal range (12{degrees}N to 83{degrees}N) and diverse natural habitats, making them an ideal study species to explore these questions. Using 1,261 estimated birth dates of wild and captive wolves across their global range, we investigated how environmental variables influence reproductive phenology in this widespread large carnivore. Birth dates for wild wolves ranged from November 22nd for Indian wolves (18{degrees}N) to June 15th for Arctic wolves (80{degrees}N). The best predictor of timing of birth was increasing daylength during the mating season, followed by precipitation variability during the year. The timing of birth in captive wolves was highly similar to wild wolves at same latitudes, suggesting they use similar environmental cues to time reproduction. Near the equator where photoperiod is more stable, wolves remained seasonal and likely use climatic cues to time reproduction. Our work reveals populations may use different environmental cues to time reproduction, a characteristic that likely facilitates adaptation to diverse environments.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reaching reproduction in a large carnivore: role of early environment and intrinsic traits
Léa Auclair, Cecilia Di Bernardi, … Camilla Wikenros·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2025
- Evolutionary and ecological determinants of the phenology of births in wild large herbivores, a systematic review
Lucie Thel, Christophe Bonenfant, Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes·Mammal ReviewPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2026
- Evolutionary determinants of reproductive seasonality: a theoretical approach
L. Burtschell, J. Dezeure, … B. Godelle·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2022
- No limit yet to phenological plasticity of reproductive timing in a high-elevation hibernator experiencing earlier springs
Caitlin P. Wells, Dirk H. Van Vuren·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2025
- Climate and Morphology Drive Breeding Periods in Frogs
B. H. Juarez, L. A. O'Connell·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2022
- Breeding at higher latitude as measured by stable isotope is associated with higher photoperiod threshold and delayed reproductive development in a songbird
D. Singh, S. R. Reed, … E. D. Ketterson·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2019