Sifting Through the Noise: A Computational Pipeline for Accurate Prioritization of Protein- Protein Binding Candidates in High-Throughput Protein Libraries
Arup MondaliD, Bhumika SinghiD, Roland H. FelkneriD, Anna De FalcoiD, GVT SwapnaiD, Gaetano Thomas MontelioneiD, Monica J. RothiD, Alberto PéreziD
Abstract
Identifying the interactome for a protein of interest is challenging due to the large number of possible binders. High-throughput experimental approaches narrow down possible binding partners, but often include false positives. Furthermore, they provide no information about what the binding region is (e.g. the binding epitope). We introduce a novel computational pipeline based on an AlphaFold2 (AF) Competition Assay (AF-CBA) to identify proteins that bind a target of interest from a pull-down experiment, along with the binding epitope. Our focus is on proteins that bind the Extraterminal (ET) domain of Bromo and Extraterminal domain (BET) proteins, but we also introduce nine additional systems to show transferability to other peptide-protein systems. We describe a series of limitations to the methodology based on intrinsic deficiencies to AF and AF-CBA, to help users identify scenarios where the approach will be most useful. Given the speed and accuracy of the methodology, we expect it to be generally applicable to facilitate target selection for experimental verification starting from high-throughput protein libraries. Table of Contents O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=173 SRC="FIGDIR/small/576374v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b90071org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc2f66org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3c1109org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1827353_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Field percentile
- 44th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient exploration of peptide libraries using active learning with AlphaFold-based screening
Jokent T. Gaza, Jherome Brylle Woody Santos, … Alberto Pérez·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2026
- Predicting Experimental Success in De Novo Binder Design: A Meta-Analysis of 3,766 Experimentally Characterised Binders
Max D. Overath, Anita Mac Rygaard, … Timothy P. Jenkins·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2025
- AlphaFold encodes the principles to identify high affinity peptide binders
- AlphaCRV: A Pipeline for Identifying Accurate Binder Topologies in Mass-Modeling with AlphaFold
Francisco J. Guzmán‐Vega, Stefan T. Arold·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- PPIscreenML: Structure-based screening for protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold
Victoria Mischley, Johannes Maier, … John Karanicolas·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2024
- The Human Bindome: A Proteome-scale Atlas of Designed Binder Candidates
Julius Wenckstern, Anna M. Díaz-Rovira, … Bruno E. Correia·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026