bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Low-frequency neural responses synchronize to distinct structural rather than lexical features during sentence comprehension
Jordi MartorelliD, Simona ManciniiD, Pedro M. Paz‐AlonsoiD, Manuel CarreirasiD, Nicola MolinaroiD
Abstract
Language comprehension involves the integration of single words (lexical units) into phrases and sentences (multi-word structures). Previous frequency-tagging studies have found that low-frequency neural responses synchronize to the frequency of multi-word structures. However, it is currently unclear how exactly structural and lexical processes jointly impact these synchronization findings. The present magnetoencephalography experiment implemented the frequency-tagging paradigm in the visual modality with written words to investigate neural synchronization to multi-word sentences varying in internal structure (reversed word orders between verb-initial Spanish and verb-final Basque sentences) and in lexical content (real words and pseudo words). We find converging evidence that neural responses largely synchronize to structural rather than lexical features. This was observed as robust phase synchronization strength to the frequency of sentences containing reversed structures, with certain lexical modulations depending on language-specific structural features. Crucially, we also found shifted phase angle dynamics between the reversed structures of Spanish and Basque sentences independently of word-level lexical characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that neural synchronization to multi-word structures is largely driven by distinct structural features operating via two segregated neural dimensions: frequency coding for the coarser aspects (i.e., timescale/duration) and phase representing the finer-grained aspects (i.e., internal structure) of multi-word structures. Our findings thus advance key insights into the core components of the neural mechanisms supporting language comprehension. HighlightsO_LINeural synchronization to sentences is driven by structural (not lexical) features. C_LIO_LIRobust sentence-frequency synchronization across languages varying in structure. C_LIO_LIPhase angle is selectively sensitive to cross-linguistic structural differences. C_LIO_LILexical modulations depend on language-specific structure. C_LIO_LIStructure synchronization segregates into two dimensions: frequency and phase. C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural encoding of phrases and sentences in spoken language comprehension
Fan Bai, Antje S. Meyer, Andrea E. Martin·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2022
- Low-frequency Cortical Activity Reflects Context-dependent Parsing of Word Sequences
Honghua Chen, Minhui Zhang, … Nai Ding·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 13, 2025
- Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy
Greta Kaufeld, Hans Rutger Bosker, … Andrea E. Martin·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2020
- Bridging the neural synchronization to linguistic structures and natural speech comprehension
Jordi Martorell, Giovanni M. Di Liberto, … Lars Meyer·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2026
- The Structure and Statistics of Language Jointly Shape Cross-frequency Neural Dynamics During Spoken Language Comprehension
Hugo Weissbart, Andrea E. Martin·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2024
- Neural entrainment to speech in theta range is affected by language properties but not by the native language of the listeners
Ege Ekin Özer, Silvana Silva Pereira, Núria Sebastián‐Gallés·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023