bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Whole Proteome Clustering of 2,307 Genomes Reveals Remarkable Conservation of Four Proteins Among Proteobacteria While Revealing Significant Annotation Issues
Svetlana LockwoodiD, Kelly A. BraytoniD, Jeff A. DailyiD, Shira Lynn BroschatiD
Abstract
To explore the concept of a minimal gene set, we clustered 8.76 M protein sequences deduced from 2,307 completely sequenced Proteobacterial genomes. To our knowledge this is the first study of this scale. Clustering resulted in 707,311 clusters of which 224,442 ranged in size from 2 to 2,894 sequences. The resulting clusters allowed us to ask the question: Is a set of proteins conserved across all Proteobacteria? We chose four essential proteins, the chaperonin GroEL, DNA dependent RNA polymerase subunits beta and beta (RpoB/RpoB), and DNA polymerase I (PolA), representing fundamental cellular functions, and examined their distribution in the clusters. We found these proteins to be remarkably conserved. Although the groEL gene was universally conserved in all the organisms in the study, the protein was not represented in all the deduced proteomes. The genes for RpoB and RpoB were missing from two genomes and merged in 88 genomes, and the sequences were sufficiently divergent that they formed separate clusters for 18 RpoB proteins (seven clusters) and 14 RpoB proteins (three clusters). For PolA, 52 organisms lacked an identifiable sequence, and seven sequences were sufficiently divergent that they formed five separate clusters. Interestingly, organisms lacking an identifiable PolA and those with divergent RpoB/RpoB were almost all endosymbionts. Furthermore, we present a range of examples of annotation issues that caused the deduced proteins to be incorrectly represented in the proteome. These annotation issues represent a significant obstacle for high throughput analyses.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: protein sequence
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Early terminated transcripts and missing proteins reflect artifacts in bacterial proteomes
Giuseppe Insana, Maria Jesus Martin, William R. Pearson·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Non-essential ribosomal proteins in bacteria and archaea identified using COGs
Michael Y. Galperin, Yuri I. Wolf, … Eugene V. Koonin·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2021
- Lost and found: re-searching and re-scoring proteomics data aids the discovery of bacterial proteins and improves proteome coverage
P. Willems, I. Fijalkowski, P. Van Damme·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019
- Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics
Enhui Wu, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, … Liang Qiao·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2024
- Protein family content uncovers lineage relationships and bacterial pathway maintenance mechanisms in DPANN archaea
C. J. Castelle, R. Meheust, … J. Banfield·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2021
- An integrative strategy to identify the entire protein coding potential of prokaryotic genomes by proteogenomics
Ulrich Omasits, Adithi R. Varadarajan, … Christian H. Ahrens·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2017