MicrobiomeBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics
Enhui Wu, Vijini MallawaarachchiiD, Jinzhi Zhao, Yi YangiD, Hebin LiuiD, Xiaoqing WangiD, Chengpin SheniD, Yu LiniD, Liang QiaoiD
Abstract
Microbiota are closely associated to human health and disease. Metaproteomics can provide a direct means to identify microbial proteins in microbiota for compositional and functional characterization. However, in-depth and accurate metaproteomics is still limited due to the extreme complexity and high diversity of microbiota samples. One of the main challenges is constructing a protein sequence database that best fits the microbiota sample. Herein, we proposed an accurate taxonomic annotation pipeline from metagenomic data for deep metaproteomic coverage, namely contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA). We mixed 12 known bacterial species to derive a synthetic microbial community to benchmark metagenomic and metaproteomic pipelines. With the optimized taxonomic annotation strategy by ConDiGA, we built a protein sequence database from the metagenomic data for metaproteomic analysis and identified about 12,000 protein groups, which was very close to the result obtained with the reference proteome protein sequence database of the 12 species. We also demonstrated the practicability of the method in real fecal samples, achieved deep proteome coverage of human gut microbiome, and compared the function and taxonomy of gut microbiota at metagenomic level and metaproteomic level. Our study can tackle the current taxonomic annotation reliability problem in metagenomics-derived protein sequence database for metaproteomics. The unique dataset of metagenomic and the metaproteomic data of the 12 bacterial species is publicly available as a standard benchmarking sample for evaluating various analysis pipelines. The code of ConDiGA is open access at GitHub for the analysis of real microbiota samples.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metagenomics
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ProteoDUDes: Taxonomic profiling for metaproteomics with false positive reduction
Henning Schiebenhoefer, Thilo Muth, … Bernhard Y. Renard·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2026
- NovoLign: metaproteomics by sequence alignment
Hugo B.C. Kleikamp, Ramon van der Zwaan, … Martin Pabst·ISME CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Metaproteomics as a tool for studying the protein landscape of human-gut bacterial species
Moses H. Stamboulian, Jamie Canderan, Yuzhen Ye·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2022
- mPies: a novel metaproteomics tool for the creation of relevant protein databases and automatized protein annotation
Johannes Werner, Augustin Géron, … Sabine Matallana‐Surget·Biology DirectPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2019
- metaExpertPro: a computational workflow for metaproteomics spectral library construction and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data analysis
- Using high abundance proteins as guides for fast and effective peptide/protein identification from metaproteomic data
Moses H. Stamboulian, Sujun Li, Yuzhen Ye·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021