Genome ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
An integrative strategy to identify the entire protein coding potential of prokaryotic genomes by proteogenomics
Ulrich Omasits, Adithi R. VaradarajaniD, Michael SchmidiD, Sandra GötzeiD, Damianos P. MelidisiD, Marc Bourqui, Olga Nikolayeva, Maxime QuébatteiD, Andrea PatrignaniiD, Christoph DehioiD, Juerg Ernst FreyiD, Mark D. RobinsoniD, Bernd WollscheidiD, Christian H. AhrensiD
Abstract
Accurate annotation of all protein-coding sequences (CDSs) is an essential prerequisite to fully exploit the rapidly growing repertoire of completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes. However, large discrepancies among the number of CDSs annotated by different resources, missed functional short open reading frames (sORFs), and overprediction of spurious ORFs represent serious limitations.\n\nOur strategy towards accurate and complete genome annotation consolidates CDSs from multiple reference annotation resources, ab initio gene prediction algorithms and in silico ORFs in an integrated proteogenomics database (iPtgxDB) that covers the entire protein-coding potential of a prokaryotic genome. By extending the PeptideClassifier concept of unambiguous peptides for prokaryotes, close to 95% of the identifiable peptides imply one distinct protein, largely simplifying downstream analysis. Searching a comprehensive Bartonella henselae proteomics dataset against such an iPtgxDB allowed us to unambiguously identify novel ORFs uniquely predicted by each resource, including lipoproteins, differentially expressed and membrane-localized proteins, novel start sites and wrongly annotated pseudogenes. Most novelties were confirmed by targeted, parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry, including unique ORFs and variants identified in a re-sequenced laboratory strain that are not present in its reference genome. We demonstrate the general applicability of our strategy for genomes with varying GC content and distinct taxonomic origin, and release iPtgxDBs for B. henselae, Bradyrhozibium diazoefficiens and Escherichia coli as well as the software to generate such proteogenomics search databases for any prokaryote.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 81
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Lost and found: re-searching and re-scoring proteomics data aids the discovery of bacterial proteins and improves proteome coverage
P. Willems, I. Fijalkowski, P. Van Damme·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019
- Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics
Enhui Wu, Vijini Mallawaarachchi, … Liang Qiao·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2024
- Balrog: A universal protein model for prokaryotic gene prediction
Markus J. Sommer, Steven L. Salzberg·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2021
- StORF-Reporter: Finding Genes between Genes
Nicholas J Dimonaco, Amanda J. Clare, … Christopher J. Creevey·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2023
- On the impact of the pangenome and annotation discrepancies while building protein sequence databases for bacteria proteogenomics
Karla Cristina Tabosa Machado, Suereta Fortuin, … Gustavo A. de Souza·Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2019
- A deep audit of the PeptideAtlas database uncovers evidence for unannotated coding genes and aberrant translation
Jose Manuel Rodríguez, Miguel Maquedano, … Michael L. Tress·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024